DIRS.INFO The most relevant business & tech news

☆ How the Current Supreme Court Would Look Under Biden’s Term-Limit Plan
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-29 | by ( Elena Shao | ) www.nytimes.com time to read: +2 min

How the Current Supreme Court Would Look Under Biden’s Term-Limit PlanIn an opinion essay published on Monday, President Biden proposed two major changes to the Supreme Court: 18-year term limits for justices and a binding code of conduct. Under Mr. Biden’s term-limit plan, presidents would appoint a new Supreme Court justice every two years. Bush era) 1991 By The New York TimesThe Supreme Court now includes six conservative justices, appointed by former Presidents Donald J. Trump, George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush, as well as three liberal ones, appointed by Mr. Biden and former President Barack Obama. The overhaul would require congressional approval, which is not expected to come from a Republican-controlled House and a divided Senate.

Persons: Biden, Democrat Biden, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Amy Coney Barrett, Republican Trump Brett M, Kavanaugh Neil M, Gorsuch, Obama Elena Kagan Sonia Sotomayor, Samuel A, Alito, Jr, Bush John G, Roberts, Clarence Thomas, H.W, Trump Brett M, Donald J, Trump, George W, Bush, George H.W, George H.W . Bush, Mr, Barack Obama Organizations: Supreme, Democrat, Republican Trump, Democratic, Republican, The New York Times Locations: George H.W .

☆ Tina Peters: Supreme Court declines to halt former Colorado official’s trial on charges related to election security breach
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-22 | by ( Devan Cole | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +1 min

CNN —The Supreme Court on Monday turned down a request from a former Colorado county clerk to halt her upcoming trial on charges stemming from her alleged involvement in an apparent security breach at the county’s election offices in 2021. Justice Neil Gorsuch denied the request from Tina Peters, the former clerk of Mesa County, Colorado, and a prominent 2020 election denier, without comment. The order came from Gorsuch because he oversees matters arising from the appeals court that rejected Peters’ efforts to throw out the criminal case. The criminal investigation into the clerk’s office began after Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, a Democrat, accused Peters and her deputies of facilitating the breach. Peters’ trial is set to begin on July 29.

Persons: Neil Gorsuch, Tina Peters, Peters, State Jena Griswold Organizations: CNN, Colorado, State Locations: Colorado, Mesa County , Colorado, Gorsuch, Mesa County’s

☆ Donald Trump transformed the federal judiciary. He could push the courts further right in a second term
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-13 | by ( Andrew Seger | Phil Mattingly | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +9 min

“I totally transformed the federal judiciary,” Trump boasted at a summit hosted by the right-wing Moms for Liberty group last summer. “Many presidents never get the opportunity to appoint a Supreme Court justice. But as Trump drives toward a potential second term, one thing is clear: He’s just getting started. (Project 2025 is the policy playbook crafted by the conservative Heritage Foundation for a potential second Trump term.) That intent for vengeance could set the bar for nominations and administration lawyers alike in a second Trump term.

Persons: CNN —, Donald Trump, “, ” Trump, Trump, ” Gregg Nunziata, Joe Biden, ”, Antonin Scalia, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, It’s, Alito, Thomas aren’t, Skye Perryman, it’s, Trump’s, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett –, “ Will, Hugh Hewitt, Mitch McConnell, I’ve, ” McConnell, Wade, Aileen Cannon –, ” Donald B, George H.W, George H.W . Bush, that’s, they’ve, Fox News ’ Sean Hannity, ” Will Chamberlain, Ron DeSantis, John Eastman, “ We’ve, ” Eastman Organizations: CNN, Liberty, Trump, Republican Party, Society, Federalist Society, Democracy, Heritage Foundation, Republican, EPA, Biden, Fox News, III, Florida Gov, Conservatism Conference Locations: “, Los Angeles, kilter, Dallas, Trump’s, Florida, George H.W ., Washington

☆ Opinion | Trump’s Next Supreme Court Picks Would Be So Much Worse
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-09 | by ( Jay Willis | ) www.nytimes.com time to read: +2 min

Everything we know about Mr. Trump today suggests that he will take his judicial cues not from the conservative legal establishment, as he did previously, but instead from the conservative legal movement’s extreme fringes. Mr. Trump’s decision to publicly align himself with Mr. Leo helped settle the nerves of establishment Republicans who were skeptical of the candidate’s ideological bona fides, and played a significant role in the 2016 election. As president, Mr. Trump selected all his nominees — Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett — from versions of the shortlist, which he periodically updated. In the past four years, however, Mr. Trump has soured on the conservative legal establishment. The Federalist Society credentials that were once essential for conservative lawyers aspiring to federal judgeships during Republican presidencies are, in Mr. Trump’s world, now apparently a liability.

Persons: Donald Trump, Trump, Leonard Leo, Antonin Scalia, Mr, Leo, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, Amy Coney Barrett —, Justice Department —, Federalist Society —, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett, Don McGahn Organizations: Federalist Society, Republicans, Mr, White, Justice Department, Society

☆ Architects of the Trump Supreme Court See Culmination of Conservative Push
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-03 | by ( Carl Hulse | ) www.nytimes.com time to read: 1 min

Back in 2016, a colleague handed Donald F. McGahn II, then a top legal adviser to the presidential candidate Donald J. Trump, an appeals court opinion that eloquently and powerfully echoed much of what Mr. McGahn saw as the evils of an out-of-control federal bureaucracy. The opinion from the Denver-based appeals court by the relatively unknown Judge Neil M. Gorsuch suggested it might be time for federal courts to confront the “behemoth” of a longstanding precedent conferring substantial regulatory power on federal officials. One month later, Mr. McGahn placed Judge Gorsuch on Mr. Trump’s list of potential Supreme Court nominees should he be elected. Four months later, he was President Trump’s first nominee to the high court. And over the past week, Justice Gorsuch wrote for the conservative majority on the Supreme Court that made sure the behemoth was slain.

Persons: Donald F, McGahn, Donald J, Trump, Neil M, Gorsuch, Trump’s, Justice Gorsuch Locations: Denver

☆ Supreme Court hands Trump partial victory in immunity case
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-01 | by ( Brent D. Griffiths | ) www.businessinsider.com time to read: +5 min

Read previewThe Supreme Court on Monday handed former President Donald Trump a partial victory by kicking the future of his January 6 criminal case down to a lower court. But on a 6-3 vote, a majority of the high court decided that former presidents do hold some immunity. Before Monday's ruling, former presidents already held sweeping immunity from civil prosecution thanks to a Nixon-era case. In taking its time to craft this ruling, justices have essentially handed Trump another victory for his delay tactics. If he were to win the election, he would likely scuttle the January 6 case and Smith's other criminal case in Florida related to Trump's hoarding of classified documents.

Persons: —, Donald Trump, Trump's, Justice Roberts, Roberts, Monday's, Nixon, Trump, Tanya Chutkan, Jack Smith's, Jeffrey Clark, Clark, It's, Neil Gorsuch, Gorsuch, recoiled, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Samuel Alito, Alito, Martha, Ann Alito Organizations: Service, Business, Department, Justice Department, Trump, Democratic, New York Times Locations: U.S, Florida, Alito's Virginia

☆ Live Updates: Supreme Court Gives Trump Substantial Immunity From Prosecution
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-01 | by ( Adam Liptak | Simon Levien | ) www.nytimes.com time to read: +8 min

The Supreme Court heard two other cases this term concerning the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., writing for the majority, said Mr. Trump had at least presumptive immunity for his official acts. If Mr. Trump prevails at the polls, he could order the Justice Department to drop the charges. After the appeals court ruled against Mr. Trump, he asked the Supreme Court to intervene. At the argument, several of the conservative justices did not seem inclined to examine the details of the charges against Mr. Trump.

Persons: Donald J, Trump, John G, Roberts, Broad, ” “, Justice Roberts, ”, Sonia Sotomayor, “, Trump’s, Mike Pence, Justice Sotomayor, Tom Brenner, Tanya S, Jack Smith, Smith’s, Neil M, Gorsuch Organizations: Capitol, Justice Department, Department, Mr, The New York Times, Federal, Court, U.S ., Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, Trump Locations: United States, Washington

But the court’s opinion also makes clear that this ruling is not a death knell for Smith’s case. Smith charged Trump with engaging in a “criminal scheme” to subvert the 2020 election; Trump has pleaded not guilty to four counts. In Nixon v. Fitzgerald, the Supreme Court held that a president enjoyed civil immunity for all “official acts.” Now, in Trump v. United States, the court grappled with which “official” acts should also receive criminal immunity. In order to settle the extent of Trump’s immunity, Chutkan should expeditiously schedule the mini-trial to hear witness testimony and receive other relevant evidence from both parties. In response to Trump’s assertion of civil immunity there, the DC Circuit put in place a lengthy discovery schedule for the lower court to determine the extent of Trump’s civil immunity.

Persons: Norman Eisen, “, Donald Trump, Danya Perry, Joshua Kolb, Neil Gorsuch, Jack Smith’s, Donald Trump’s, Norm Eisen, Tanya Chutkan, Smith, Trump, Nixon, Fitzgerald, —, Joshua Kolb CJ, John Roberts, Justice Department —, Mike Pence, Mark Meadows, Jeffrey Clark —, Clark, Steve Jones, Meadows, Brad Raffensperger, Jones, Meadows’s, Sotomayor, Chutkan, Pence, Bill Barr —, Trump’s, slimming, ”, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson Organizations: CNN, Perry Law, Division, Southern, of, State, Moreland Commission, Nixon, Trump v ., Justice Department, Trump, White, Trump administration, Georgia, Meadows, Circuit, Congress, Capitol Police, Capitol, DC Circuit, Twitter Locations: of New York, New York, Moreland, Trump v, Trump v . United States, Georgia, Fulton, Meadows

☆ Live Updates: Supreme Court Says Trump Is Partly Shielded From Prosecution
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-01 | by ( Adam Liptak | ) www.nytimes.com time to read: +5 min

The Supreme Court heard two other cases this term concerning the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., writing for the majority, said Mr. Trump had immunity for his official acts. Two of the four charges against Mr. Trump are based on that law. After the appeals court ruled against Mr. Trump, he asked the Supreme Court to intervene. At the argument, several of the conservative justices did not seem inclined to examine the details of the charges against Mr. Trump.

Persons: Donald J, Trump, John G, Roberts, ”, Sonia Sotomayor, Tom Brenner, Tanya S, Jack Smith, Smith’s, Neil M, Gorsuch Organizations: Capitol, “, The New York Times, Justice Department, Federal, Court, U.S ., Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, Trump, Mr Locations: Washington, United States

☆ Oral dissents are back in vogue at the Supreme Court as liberals lament latest rulings
▼ + stars: | 2024-06-29 | by ( Joan Biskupic | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +9 min

CNN —As the conservative Supreme Court majority has won case after case in recent days, liberal dissenters are having their moment in the courtroom. Other justices stared out at spectators or down at notes, perhaps anticipating the next opinions, and dissents, to be revealed. The court majority reversed a 1984 milestone that required judges to defer to reasonable agency interpretations of their congressional mandates. Her oral dissent lasted nearly 15 minutes, about five minutes longer than Roberts’ rendition of the majority opinion. They begin with the author of the majority opinion delivering the facts of the case, law involved, and the resolution.

Persons: Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Neil Gorsuch, Sotomayor, ”, “, ” Gorsuch, John Roberts, Kagan, Roberts, They’ve, Kagan’s, ” Kagan, Roe, Wade, Gorsuch, Sotomayor’s, Antonin Scalia, Jackson, Amy Coney Barrett, Barrett, improvidently, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, ” Alito, Biden, chiding Organizations: CNN, Friday, Natural Resources Defense, “, Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, US Justice Department, Labor, Conservative Locations: Oregon, Grants, American, Idaho

☆ The Supreme Court just made it easier for governments to remove unhoused people from public spaces
▼ + stars: | 2024-06-28 | by ( Eliza Relman | ) www.businessinsider.com time to read: +5 min

Read previewThe Supreme Court on Friday ruled that it's constitutional for local governments to make it illegal to sleep in public places, even when there isn't sufficient shelter space. The case — City of Grants Pass v. Johnson — is the most consequential the court has decided dealing with homelessness in decades. AdvertisementThe Supreme Court ruled that laws regulating sleeping in public places don't constitute cruel and unusual punishment. Homeless rights activists held a rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court on April 22, 2024, the day the court heard oral argument in City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. Johnson. An increasing number of cities and states across the country have passed laws — often anti-camping ordinances — similar to that in Grants Pass.

Persons: —, Johnson —, Justice Neil Gorsuch, Johnson, California —, Gorsuch, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Kevin Dietsch, Gavin Newsom, Newsom, Ron DeSantis, Jesse Rabinowitz Organizations: Service, Business, Circuit, Homeless, U.S, Supreme, Democratic, California Gov, Gov, National Homelessness Law Center Locations: Grants, Grants Pass , Oregon, Martin v, Boise, California, City, Grants Pass, Oregon, Florida

☆ Supreme Court delivers blow to power of federal agencies, overturning 40-year-old precedent
▼ + stars: | 2024-06-28 | by ( Lawrence Hurley | ) www.cnbc.com time to read: +4 min

A general view of the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, U.S., June 1, 2024. WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Friday overturned a 40-year-old precedent that has been a target of the right because it is seen as bolstering the power of "deep state" bureaucrats. It is the latest in a series of rulings in which the conservative justices have taken aim at the power of federal agencies. The ruling was 6-3 with the conservative justices in the majority and liberal justices dissenting. The Trump administration had embraced the war on "deep state" agency power, selecting judicial nominees in part based on their hostility to the federal bureaucracy.

Persons: WASHINGTON —, Chevron, John Roberts, Elena Kagan, Reagan, Magnuson, Trump, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett, Joe Organizations: U.S, Supreme, WASHINGTON, Chevron, Natural Resources Defense, Liberal, Republican, Democratic, National Marine Fisheries Service, Stevens Fishery Conservation, Management, Trump Locations: Washington , U.S, New England

☆ Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Sleeping Outdoors in Homelessness Case
▼ + stars: | 2024-06-28 | by ( Abbie Vansickle | ) www.nytimes.com time to read: 1 min

The Supreme Court on Friday upheld an Oregon city’s laws aimed at banning homeless residents from sleeping outdoors, saying they did not violate the Constitution’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment. The decision is likely to reverberate beyond Oregon, altering how cities and states in the West police homelessness. The ruling, by a 6-to-3 vote, split along ideological lines, with Justice Neil M. Gorsuch writing for the majority. The laws, enacted in Grants Pass, Ore., penalize sleeping and camping in public places, including sidewalks, streets and city parks. In her dissent, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, wrote that the decision would leave society’s most vulnerable with fewer protections.

Persons: Neil M, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson Locations: Oregon, West, Grants

☆ Homeless people can be ticketed for sleeping outside, Supreme Court rules
▼ + stars: | 2024-06-28 | by ( Devan Cole | John Fritze | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +6 min

CNN —The Supreme Court ruled Friday in favor of an Oregon city that ticketed homeless people for sleeping outside, rejecting arguments that such “anti-camping” ordinances violate the Constitution’s ban on “cruel and unusual” punishment. The case centered on “anti-camping” ordinances in Grants Pass, Oregon, that were challenged by several residents experiencing homelessness. “For some people, sleeping outside is their only option.” The city, she said, “punishes them for being homeless. The ordinances barred people from sleeping in public with “bedding,” which can include sleeping bags or bundled-up clothing. In reaction to the Supreme Court’s ruling, housing rights groups came out in full force to condemn the decision.

Persons: Neil Gorsuch, It’s, ” Gorsuch, Gorsuch, ”, Sonia Sotomayor, ” Sotomayor, “, Sotomayor, Theane Evangelis, Elena Kagan, Jesse Rabinowitz, ” Gavin Newsom –, California –, Jay Cheng Organizations: CNN, ”, US Department of Housing, Urban, National Homelessness Law, National Alliance, Homelessness, Democratic Locations: Oregon, Grants Pass , Oregon, United States, California, Francisco

Charges against Trump not likely affectedThe people who pushed their way into the Capitol aren’t the only ones who are facing the obstruction charge. But even before the court’s decision was handed down, Smith made clear that the charge was based on different circumstances in Trump’s case. The Supreme Court’s opinion did not address the fake electors scheme specifically. What is far more important for Trump is the Supreme Court’s pending decision on immunity. The Justice Department has taken steps for months in its prosecutions of rioters to shore up the obstruction charges.

Persons: Donald Trump, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh –, Biden, Trump, Jack Smith, Smith, John Roberts, nodded, –, General Merrick Garland, Garland, Jackson, Barrett, Fischer, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Roberts, Amy Coney Barrett, “, ”, ” Jackson, Joseph Fischer, Fischer “, ” Barrett, CNN’s Kristen Holmes, Paula Reid Organizations: CNN, Capitol, Trump, Enron, Trump . Trump, Justice Department, Department, The, Republican, Democratic, United States Capitol Locations: Pennsylvania

☆ Supreme Court overturns 1984 Chevron precedent, curbing power of federal government
▼ + stars: | 2024-06-28 | by ( John Fritze | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +4 min

CNN —The Supreme Court on Friday significantly weakened the power of federal agencies to approve regulations in a major decision that could have sweeping implications for the environment, public health and the workplace. But the decision will net a far wider swath of federal regulations affecting many facets of American life. The decision overturns the Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council precedent that required courts to give deference to federal agencies when creating regulations based on an ambiguous law. The justices have been incrementally diminishing federal power for years, but the new case gave the court an opportunity to take a much broader stride. The Supreme Court had been trending in that direction for years, knocking back attempts by federal agencies in other contexts to approve regulations on their own.

Persons: Chevron, John Roberts, ”, Neil Gorsuch, Elana Kagan, ” Kagan, Biden, Trump Organizations: CNN, Commerce Department, Chevron, Natural Resources Defense, Environmental Protection Agency, Conservatives Locations: Chevron, Washington

☆ Supreme Court allows emergency abortions in Idaho for now
▼ + stars: | 2024-06-27 | by ( Lawrence Hurley | ) www.cnbc.com time to read: +6 min

A group of doctors join abortion rights supporters at a rally outside the Supreme Court on April 24, 2024 in Washington, DC. The court dismissed an appeal brought by Idaho officials, meaning a lower court ruling that allows doctors in the state to perform abortions in emergency situations remains in effect for now. The legislation, known as the Defense of Life Act, went into effect in 2022 when the Supreme Court rolled back Roe. The Supreme Court in January allowed Idaho to enforce the provisions while agreeing to hear oral arguments in the case. The emergency room dispute is one of two abortion cases the Supreme Court considered this term, both of which arose in the aftermath of the 2022 decision to overturn Roe.

Persons: WASHINGTON —, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Alito, Biden, Amy Coney Barrett, Elena Kagan, Donald Trump, Roe, Wade, Lynn Winmill Organizations: WASHINGTON, Conservative, Liberal, Defense, Labor, U.S, Circuit, Supreme, Food Locations: Washington , DC, Idaho, U.S, San Francisco

☆ Supreme Court rejects multibillion-dollar Purdue Pharma opioid settlement that shielded Sackler family
▼ + stars: | 2024-06-27 | by ( John Fritze | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +3 min

As the nation continues to grapple with the opioid epidemic, the Sackler family had agreed to pay $6 billion to families and states as part of an agreement to wind down Purdue Pharma, the maker of OxyContin. In exchange, the Sackler family would be immunized from future civil liability claims. Those supporting the bankruptcy argued the yearslong process had gone on long enough and was unlikely to yield additional money from the Sackler family. The vast majority of known current opioid victims and their families supported the agreement. But the Justice Department said it was a raw deal for victims – particularly potential future victims.

Persons: Sackler, Neil Gorsuch, ” Gorsuch, “, ” Kavanaugh, ”, John Roberts, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan Organizations: Washington CNN, Chief, Congress, Purdue Pharma, Department Locations: New York

☆ Supreme Court Rejects Liability Shield at Center of Purdue Pharma Settlement
▼ + stars: | 2024-06-27 | by ( Abbie Vansickle | ) www.nytimes.com time to read: +1 min

The Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that members of the wealthy Sackler family cannot be shielded from lawsuits over their role in the opioid crisis as part of a bankruptcy settlement that would channel billions of dollars to victims and their families. In a 5-to-4 decision, written by Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, a majority of the justices held that the federal bankruptcy code does not authorize a liability shield for third parties in bankruptcy agreements. Justice Gorsuch was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel A. Alito Jr., Amy Coney Barrett and Ketanji Brown Jackson. In a strongly worded dissent, Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh wrote that the “decision is wrong on the law and devastating for more than 100,000 opioid victims and their families.” He was joined by Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. The decision jeopardizes a carefully negotiated settlement Purdue and the Sacklers had reached in which members of the family promised to give up to $6 billion to states, local governments, tribes and individuals to address a devastating public health crisis.

Persons: Sackler, Justice Neil M, Gorsuch, Clarence Thomas, Samuel A, Alito Jr, Amy Coney Barrett, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Brett M, Kavanaugh, John G, Roberts Jr, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan Organizations: Chief, Purdue

☆ The Supreme Court is poised to unleash a weapon against Biden's climate policies
▼ + stars: | 2024-06-27 | by ( Catherine Boudreau | ) www.businessinsider.com time to read: +5 min

Climate advocates and business groups are closely watching the US Supreme Court this week. The court could issue a ruling that sharply curtails the federal government's power to regulate the environment, including President Joe Biden's climate policies. Legal experts say the Supreme Court, with its conservative majority, is likely to overturn or significantly limit the Chevron doctrine. Meanwhile, he added, administrative lawyers have been preparing for this very scenario at the Supreme Court. Biden's EPA hasn't relied on the Chevron doctrine to defend its climate rules.

Persons: Joe Biden's, Charles Koch, Chevron, Biden, isn't, Ronald Reagan, David Doniger, Reagan, Doniger, Obama, Neil Gorsuch, Elena Kagan, Trump Organizations: Service, Business, Action Institute, Environmental, Agency, Natural Resources Defense Council, Chevron, Trump, EPA, Republican, Supreme Locations: Chevron

☆ Supreme Court allows White House to press social media companies to remove disinformation
▼ + stars: | 2024-06-26 | by ( John Fritze | Brian Fung | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +7 min

CNN —The Supreme Court on Wednesday said the White House and federal agencies such as the FBI may continue to urge social media platforms to take down content the government views as misinformation, handing the Biden administration a technical if important election-year victory. Republican officials in two states – Missouri and Louisiana – and five social media users sued over that practice in 2022, arguing that the White House did far more than “persuade” the tech giants to take down a few deceptive items. That might include, the justices theorized, social media threats targeting public figures or disclosures of sensitive information about US troops. The case arrived at the high court at a time when the government has repeatedly warned of foreign efforts to use social media to influence elections. The jawboning case was one of several high-profile matters the court is deciding at intersection of the First Amendment and social media.

Persons: Biden, Amy Coney Barrett, “, ” Barrett, ” Biden, –, Hunter, John Roberts, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Brett Kavanaugh, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Alito, Samel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, ”, ” Alito, ’, unjustifiably, Vivek Murthy, Roe, Wade, Roberts, Kavanaugh, Barrett Organizations: CNN, White, FBI, Biden, Department of Homeland Security, Facebook, Republican, Centers for Disease Control, Infrastructure Security Agency, Supreme, National Intelligence Locations: – Missouri, Louisiana, Florida, Texas

☆ Justices Appear to Mistakenly Reveal a Key Abortion Ruling
▼ + stars: | 2024-06-26 | by ( Matthew Cullen | ) www.nytimes.com time to read: +1 min

The Supreme Court seems poised to temporarily allow emergency abortions in Idaho when a woman’s health is at risk, according to a copy of what appeared to be the court’s opinion that was posted today, and then removed, from the court’s website. The majority’s unsigned opinion said that the case was “dismissed as improvidently granted” — rather than decided on merits — according to the 22-page document, which was published this afternoon by Bloomberg News. Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch dissented. A spokeswoman for the Supreme Court said that the document had been “inadvertently” uploaded by its publications unit. It would be the second time this term that the justices have deflected ruling on the merits of abortion.

Persons: “, improvidently, ” —, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch Organizations: Bloomberg News Locations: Idaho

☆ Supreme Court Rejects Challenge to Biden Administration’s Contacts With Social Media Companies
▼ + stars: | 2024-06-26 | by ( Adam Liptak | ) www.nytimes.com time to read: +1 min

The Supreme Court handed the Biden administration a major practical victory on Wednesday, rejecting a challenge to its contacts with social media platforms to combat what administration officials said was misinformation. The court ruled that the states and users who had challenged the contacts had not suffered the sort of direct injury that gave them standing to sue. The decision, by a 6 to 3 vote, left fundamental legal questions for another day. “For months,” Justice Alito wrote, “high-ranking government officials placed unrelenting pressure on Facebook to suppress Americans’ free speech. Because the court unjustifiably refuses to address this serious threat to the First Amendment, I respectfully dissent.”

Persons: “, Amy Coney Barrett, ”, Samuel A, Alito Jr, Clarence Thomas, Neil M, Gorsuch, Alito, unjustifiably Organizations: Court, Biden, Facebook

☆ Early divisions signal bitter internal conflicts as Supreme Court turns toward final decisions
▼ + stars: | 2024-06-25 | by ( John Fritze | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +9 min

Even as the court is sometimes finding wider-than-expected majorities for relatively limited outcomes, the nine justices are regularly in conflict over the meaning of decisions. A number of lower-profile cases have also sparked deep doctrinal divisions, even when the final vote count is lopsided. “It does seem, at least anecdotally, unusual to have this many separate opinions in cases with relatively lower stakes,” said Steve Vladeck, CNN Supreme Court analyst and professor at the University of Texas School of Law. The Supreme Court earlier this month tossed out an appeal from anti-abortion doctors challenging expanded access to the abortion pill mifepristone. Among them, Justice Sonia Sotomayor slammed the court’s majority opinion for its reliance on history to decide the trademark dispute.

Persons: ”, Steve Vladeck, “, dinged, councilwoman, Brett Kavanaugh, ” Kavanaugh, Donald Trump, Jack Smith’s, yank Trump, Trump, Amy Coney Barrett, Samuel Alito, Kavanaugh, ” Barrett, Aziz Huq, Huq, Moore, John Roberts ’, hasn't, Neil Gorsuch chimed, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, ” Alito, Clarence Thomas, Alito, it’s, Sylvia Gonzalez, Florida GOP Sen, Marco Rubio, Sonia Sotomayor Organizations: CNN, University of Texas School of Law, Trump, Capitol, University of Chicago, New York, Police, Florida GOP, Republican Locations: Moore, Texas, Trump, concurrences

☆ Supreme Court to weigh state restrictions on gender-affirming care for youths
▼ + stars: | 2024-06-24 | by ( Lawrence Hurley | ) www.cnbc.com time to read: +4 min

A view of the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, U.S., June 17, 2024. WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday waded into the contentious debate over gender-affirming care for transgender minors by agreeing to resolve challenges to a law in Tennessee that seeks to restrict it. The justices will review an appeals court ruling that upheld the measure. In a separate case, the court in April allowed Idaho to mostly enforce a similar law. The plaintiffs then asked the Supreme Court to step in.

Persons: WASHINGTON —, Elizabeth Prelogar, Jeffrey Sutton, Neil Gorsuch Organizations: U.S, Supreme, WASHINGTON, Movement Advancement, Biden, Circuit Locations: Washington , U.S, Tennessee, Idaho, Kentucky, Cincinnati, West Virginia

Search resuls for: "gorsuch"

25 mentions found