At first blush, the case the Supreme Court will hear on Tuesday seems technical, requiring the justices to parse a decades-old statute mainly concerned with the destruction of business records.
But the case has the potential to knock out half of the federal charges against former President Donald J. Trump for plotting to subvert the 2020 election, entangle hundreds of Jan. 6 prosecutions and help adjudicate the very meaning of the attack on the Capitol.
The immediate question for the justices is whether a federal law aimed primarily at white-collar crime, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, can be used to prosecute members of the mob who stormed the Capitol, including the defendant in the case, Joseph W. Fischer, a former Pennsylvania police officer.
More than 300 people have been prosecuted under the law, which makes it a crime to obstruct an official proceeding.
But its language is broad, and prosecutors say its plain terms cover Mr. Fischer’s conduct.
Persons:
Donald J, Trump, Joseph W, Fischer, Fischer’s
Organizations:
Capitol, Sarbanes, Oxley, Enron
Locations:
Pennsylvania