DIRS.INFO top alerts submit data jurnalism about API
login
Top related persons:
Nilima Amin - 2 Amin - 2 skipjack - 1 couldn't - 1 Jon Tigar's - 1 Amin's - 1 Tigar - 1 Jonathan Stempel - 1
Top related locs:
Wall Silicon California Oakland , California U.S Northern District Northern District of California
Top related orgs:
Subway - 2 Service - 1 New York Times - 1 The Times - 1 U.S - 1 District - 1 Court - 1 Northern District of - 1

Search resuls for: "Nilima Amin"


3 mentions found


☆ The lawsuit casting doubt on whether Subway's tuna is actually completely made of tuna has been dismissed
  + stars: | 2023-07-31 | by ( Grace Dean | ) www.businessinsider.com   time to read: +4 min
Subway and a plaintiff have agreed to dismiss a lawsuit casting doubt on what its tuna contains. Subway has vigorously defended its tuna and has asked the court to sanction the plaintiff's lawyers. The class-action lawsuit, filed in January 2021, initially claimed that Subway's tuna products "entirely lack any trace of tuna" and instead are made up of "a mixture of various concoctions." Further amendments to the lawsuit claimed that testing showed that Subway's tuna contained detectable traces of chicken, pork, and cattle DNA. Subway's lawyers said that they doubted this was the real reason Amin wanted to dismiss the lawsuit.
Persons: skipjack, Nilima Amin, couldn't, Amin Organizations: Service, New York Times, The Times, Subway Locations: Wall, Silicon
☆ Subway tuna lawsuit has been dismissed
  + stars: | 2023-07-27 | by ( Jonathan Stempel | Law Firm Clifford Chance Posts Increased Revenue | Stalled Profits | ) www.reuters.com   time to read: +2 min
July 27 (Reuters) - A high-profile lawsuit by a California woman who claimed that Subway's tuna products contain ingredients other than tuna has been dismissed. The Oakland, California-based judge will rule later on Subway's request that Amin's lawyers be sanctioned for bringing a frivolous class action. Amin claimed to have ordered Subway tuna products more than 100 times before suing in January 2021, claiming that its tuna sandwiches, salads and wraps included other fish species, chicken, pork and cattle, or no tuna at all. Subway also faulted Amin's "ever-changing" theories to debunk its claim that its tuna products were "100% tuna." In opposing sanctions, Amin's lawyers said she had a "good faith, non-frivolous basis based on testing and evidence that there was something amiss" with Subway tuna.
Persons: Nilima Amin, Jon Tigar's, Amin, Amin's, Tigar, Jonathan Stempel, Jamie Freed Organizations: U.S, District, Subway, Court, Northern District of, Thomson Locations: California, Oakland , California, U.S, Northern District, Northern District of California
☆ Woman who sued over Subway tuna seeks to quit case; Subway demands sanctions
  + stars: | 2023-05-08 | by ( Jonathan Stempel | Industry Insight | Wall Street Research | ) www.reuters.com   time to read: +2 min
REUTERS/Thomas White/IllustrationMay 8 (Reuters) - The California woman suing Subway for claiming its tuna products contain ingredients other than tuna wants to end her lawsuit because she is pregnant, prompting Subway to demand her lawyers be sanctioned for bringing a frivolous case. Amin's lawyers did not immediately respond on Monday to requests for comment. The plaintiff claimed to have ordered Subway tuna products more than 100 times before suing in January 2021. She accused Subway of using other fish species, chicken, pork and cattle in its tuna products, or no tuna at all. The case is Amin v Subway Restaurants Inc et al, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No.
0 next >>
Total: 3