Top related persons:
Top related locs:
Top related orgs:

Search resuls for: "KRISTIN MAYES"


3 mentions found


Republican presidential candidate former President Donald Trump participates in a question-and-answer session at the National Association of Black Journalists convention in Chicago, July 31, 2024. An Arizona grand jury that indicted 18 allies of former President Donald Trump on criminal charges related to trying to overturn his 2020 election loss in the state was interested in indicting Trump as well, but was asked not to do so by the state attorney general's office, according to a new court filing. Attorney General Kristin Mayes' office disclosed the grand jury's interest in charging Trump in a filing that disputed a claim by many of the defendants that the office was politically biased in prosecuting them in the so-called fake electors case. "The State Grand Jury was told by the Attorney General's Office on multiple occasions that it had the discretion to indict no one," the office wrote. He also was charged last year in state court in Atlanta with trying to overturn Biden's victory that year in Georgia.
Persons: Donald Trump, indicting Trump, Kristin Mayes, Trump, Rudy Giuliani, Mark Meadows, Mayes, Joe Biden Organizations: National Association of Black Journalists, Trump, White, Court, Republican, The New York Times, Attorney, Arizona Legislature, Legislature, Arizona Republican Party, . Justice Department, Washington , D.C Locations: Chicago, An Arizona, Maricopa County, State, Arizona, Washington ,, Atlanta, Georgia
Read the Arizona Supreme Court’s Abortion Ruling
  + stars: | 2024-04-09 | by ( ) www.nytimes.com   time to read: +2 min
§ 13-3604, which had provided that a woman who has an abortion that is not necessary to save her life shall be imprisoned from one to five years. By affirmatively declining to hold women criminally responsible for seeking or obtaining an abortion, the legislature did not grant women a right to seek an abortion; it simply decided the state would not prosecute women for doing so. The majority misses the mark by asking and then answering whether § 36-2322(B) grants a limited right to abortion. ¶79 Fifth, the majority incorrectly elevates the construction note in § 36-2322(B)'s session law to equal its text. See Redgrave v. Ducey, 251 Ariz. 451, 457 ¶ 22 (2021) (concluding that if statutory text conflicts with a
Persons: KRISTIN MAYES, JUSTICE TIMMER, CHIEF JUSTICE BRUTINEL, Reg, Sess, , Dobbs, Redgrave Organizations: CHIEF
April 19 (Reuters) - President Joe Biden had the power to require employees of federal contractors to receive COVID-19 vaccinations, a U.S. appeals court ruled on Wednesday, throwing out a judge's ruling that had blocked the mandate in Arizona. The court reversed a federal judge in Phoenix who blocked the mandate in Arizona last year. The office of Arizona Attorney General Kristin Mayes, a Democrat who took office in January, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The U.S. Supreme Court last year blocked Biden's separate mandate that businesses with 100 or more employees require workers to receive COVID-19 vaccines or undergo regular testing. Last month, a New Orleans-based federal appeals court ruled that federal agencies could not enforce a requirement that government employees receive vaccines.
Total: 3