DIRS.INFO The most relevant business & tech news

☆ The Supreme Court is sending some mixed signals about executive power
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-14 | by ( Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert | ) www.businessinsider.com time to read: +8 min

Advertisement"So that is, in theory, taking power away from unelected officials," Justin Crowe, a professor of political science at Williams University who researches the Supreme Court, told Business Insider. With Corner Post, Entin said, the Supreme Court created a statute of limitations that, from the standpoint of federal agencies, never really expires. But the Court didn't stop at giving itself the reins to interpret regulations that federal agencies are beholden to. In the Trump case, the Supreme Court offered Trump broad immunity for some of his acts concerning his January 6 election interference case. In the July 6 episode of Slate's Supreme Court analysis podcast "Amicus with Dahlia Lithwick," Senior Court Reporter Mark Joseph Stern said the Court spent this term expanding its power and "restructuring representative democracy to make it less representative and less democratic."

Persons: —, Raimondo, Reagan, presidentially, Justin Crowe, wouldn't, Loper, Jonathan Entin, Entin, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Trump, Tanya Chutkan, Dahlia Lithwick, Mark Joseph Stern Organizations: Service, Loper Bright Enterprises, Inc, Governors, Federal Reserve System, Business, Chevron, Environmental Protection Agency, Congress, Williams University, EPA, Securities Exchange Commission, of Health, Human Service, Case Western Reserve University, Federal Reserve Board, Supreme, DC Circuit, Federal, Trump v ., Trump, DC Locations: Chevron, Trump v, Trump v . United States

☆ How the Supreme Court could decide Trump’s blockbuster fight for immunity
▼ + stars: | 2024-06-18 | by ( John Fritze | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +8 min

Trump’s out of luck: No immunityThe simplest outcome would be for the Supreme Court to rule that former presidents are not entitled to immunity from criminal prosecution. Nixon and the ‘outer perimeter’ of powerBut the justices could reach more broadly by granting some degree of immunity for “official” actions. That official-versus-private debate emerged as a key component of Trump’s immunity battle and will be closely scrutinized once the opinion lands. In terms of timing, a lot would depend on the direction the Supreme Court gives Chutkan in its opinion. It could also raise the possibility of further pre-trial legal wrangling, unless the Supreme Court explicitly ruled out appeals of those decisions.

Persons: Donald Trump, –, Jack Smith’s, Trump, “ Trump, ”, Jonathan Entin, Trump’s, John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh –, he’s, ” Roberts, ” It’s, Neil Gorsuch, ” Kavanaugh, Nixon, Fitzgerald, Ernest Fitzgerald, Richard Nixon, Rudy Giuliani, Matthew Seligman, Alison LaCroix, ‘, Tanya Chutkan, “, ” Entin, Smith, LaCroix, we’ll, ’ ” Organizations: CNN, Trump, Case Western Reserve University’s School of Law, Appeals, DC Circuit, Supreme, Nixon, Air Force, Constitutional, Center, Stanford Law School, Security, University of Chicago Law School, US

☆ A 15-year-old law review by Brett Kavanaugh offers a clue at how the Supreme Court Justice could rule in Trump's immunity case
▼ + stars: | 2024-04-29 | by ( Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert | ) www.businessinsider.com time to read: +6 min

Many in the political world are waiting with bated breath as the Supreme Court considers arguments over whether Donald Trump is immune from criminal prosecution for his behavior while in office. Depending on how the high court rules, some of Trump's most serious legal troubles could melt away instantly. But one clue, hidden in a 2009 legal review written by Trump-appointed Justice Brett Kavanaugh, could indicate how the conservative judge may decide in this case. One might contend that the country needs a check against a bad-behaving or law-breaking president, Kavanaugh acknowledges, but "the Constitution already provides that check." AdvertisementRepresentatives for the Supreme Court did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Business Insider.

Persons: Donald Trump, Trump, Brett Kavanaugh, Kavanaugh, didn't, Jonathan Entin, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Entin, SCOTUS Organizations: Service, Republican, US, Case Western Reserve University, Supreme, DC Circuit, Department of Justice, Democratic, Trump, Business Locations: Minnesota

“Partial-birth abortion” is a non-medical term for a procedure known as dilation and extraction, or D&X, which is already federally prohibited. “It would allow a partial-birth abortion,” Ohio Gov. “If the federal law prohibits a particular technique, then that’s going to prevail over a state law that might be inconsistent,” he said. DeWine was serving in the U.S. Senate when the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act was passed in 2003. “‘Partial-birth abortion’ is a made-up term that only serves to create confusion and stigmatize abortion later in pregnancy,” she said.

Persons: hasn't, ”, Mike DeWine, we’ve, —, Dan Kobil, Jonathan Entin, DeWine, George W, Bush, Dan Tierney, Kobil, it’s “, Dave Yost, “, he’s, Kelsey Pritchard, Susan B, Anthony Pro, Amy Natoce, ” Mae Winchester, “ ‘, ’, “ It’s, it’s, Martin Haskell, Haskell, Mike Gonidakis, ” Haskell, Kellie Copeland, ” Ohio hasn’t, Pritchard, Christine Fernando Organizations: Republicans, ”, ” Ohio Gov, Capital University, Constitution, Case Western State University, “, Supreme, U.S . Senate, U.S, Republican, The Ohio, America, Biden Administration, Protect Women, Ohio, Ohioans United, Reproductive Rights, Health Department, Associated Press Locations: COLUMBUS , Ohio, Ohio, U.S, ” Ohio, Columbus, U.S ., The, Protect Women Ohio, Cleveland, Chicago

Search resuls for: "Jonathan Entin"

4 mentions found