DIRS.INFO The most relevant business & tech news

The Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected an attempt by Children's Health Defense, the anti-vaccine group founded by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., to protect doctors being investigated in Washington state for allegedly spreading misinformation about the Covid-19 virus. The emergency application was denied by Justice Elena Kagan on behalf of the court. Circuit Court of Appeals, declined to impose injunctions blocking investigations led by the Washington Medical Commission. The Supreme Court did not ask the state to file a response to the application, suggesting that it was deemed lacking in legal merit. Two doctors subject to investigations, Richard Eggleston and Thomas Siler, had joined Kennedy's group in asking the court to weigh in.

Persons: Robert F, Kennedy Jr, Elena Kagan, ” Rick Jaffe, Kennedy, Donald Trump, Richard Eggleston, Thomas Siler, Eggleston, Siler Organizations: Children's Health Defense, Department of Health, Human Services, Circuit, Washington Medical Commission Locations: Washington, San Francisco

☆ Amy Coney Barrett: Meet the last best hope for Supreme Court liberals
▼ + stars: | 2024-11-08 | by ( Joan Biskupic | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +19 min

CNN —Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett stands apart. And that is why Barrett has become the best hope for what remains of the liberal wing, particularly after Trump’s election victory. As Trump returns to the White House, the Supreme Court may be even more positioned to check the balance of powers. Nonetheless, progressives have few options, and an uncertain horizon, and cannot help but imbue Barrett with hope. “As Justice Barrett said…,” is a common Kagan refrain, too.

Persons: Amy Coney Barrett, Donald Trump’s, Barrett, Trump, imbue Barrett, Sandra Day O’Connor, Reagan, Anthony Kennedy, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Barrett homed, Sotomayor, …, Kagan, Kagan interjected, “, Richard Glossip, Brett Kavanaugh, Thomas, Roberts, Kavanaugh, Adam Feldman, Jake Truscott, Republican centrists O’Connor, Kennedy, Lewis Powell, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Dobbs, Antonin Scalia, Scalia’s, Scalia, Jesse, Warren Burger, Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, they’ve, Gorsuch, ” Barrett, Jackson, Alito, ” Alito, Biden, Justice Roberts, CNN Kagan, Barrett’s, Roe, Wade, ‘, ’ Barrett, Adrian Zackheim, Justice Barrett, ” Zackheim, Sentinel publicists, Sen, Mitch McConnell, McConnell, Barack Obama’s, Merrick Garland, Ginsburg Organizations: CNN, Republican, White, Republicans, Representatives, Notre Dame, Trump, Democratic, Glossip, Jackson, Health Organization, New York, Association, Harvard, ., Biden, Capitol, of Education, Ronald Reagan, Sentinel, Penguin Random, Wall Street, University of Louisville McConnell Center Locations: America, Oklahoma, ”, . United States, New Orleans, Washington, Haiti, Idaho, California, Louisville

☆ Supreme Court allows Virginia to purge suspected noncitizens from voter registration rolls
▼ + stars: | 2024-10-30 | by ( John Fritze | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +5 min

Republicans, including former President Donald Trump, framed the effort in Virginia as a commonsense way of ensuring noncitizens don’t vote. At issue are about 1,600 voter registrations that Virginia said came from self-identified noncitizens but that a US District Court said hadn’t been fully vetted for citizenship status. Noncitizens are not allowed to vote in federal elections; none of the lower court rulings had changed that fact. But documented cases of noncitizens voting are extremely rare. Those opposed to the program relied on a 1993 law, the National Voter Registration Act, which bars states from making “systematic” changes to voting rolls with 90 days of a federal election.

Persons: Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Donald Trump, noncitizens, Biden, Trump, Virginia, hadn’t, Glenn Youngkin, “, ”, Patricia Tolliver Giles, noncitizen, –, Giles ’, “ Purcell, weren’t, it’s, CNN’s Tierney Sneed Organizations: CNN, Liberal, noncitizens, Virginia Gov, Republican, Department of Motor Vehicles, Youngkin, Biden, Democratic Locations: Virginia, Georgia

☆ How did the pussy-bow blouse became a political staple?
▼ + stars: | 2024-10-08 | by ( Leah Dolan | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +8 min

Vice President Kamala Harris wore a plum-hued pussy-bow shirt to speak with 60 Minutes correspondent Bill Whitaker. A slew of newly employed women in the ‘70s and ‘80s agreed, and the pussy-bow blouse’s sudden ubiquity in offices cemented it as a symbol of corporate, second-wave feminism. Melania Trump wore a pink Gucci pussy bow blouse at the presidential debate at Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri on October 9, 2016. Rick Wilking/Pool/AFP/Getty ImagesPeople gather at Stortorget square in Stockholm showing support for Sara Danius by wearing make-shift pussy-bow blouses with scarves and neck-ties. A ‘loaded garment’But still, the pussy-bow blouse continues to divide opinion.

Persons: ” Margaret Thatcher, Miriam Stoppard, “, Thatcher, Margaret Thatcher, Tim Graham, ”, Duchess Louise de La, — King Louis XIV’s, it’s, Kamala Harris, Donald Trump, Oprah, Bill Whitaker, Harris, John T, Malloy, Richard Nixon, Helen Thomas, Ik, Meg Whitman, Proctor, Gamble’s, I’m, Nina McLemore, ’, Hilary Clinton, Elizabeth Warren, Maxine Waters, Elena Kagan, Melania Trump, Kate Moss, Johnny Depp’s, Sara Danius —, Swedish Academy —, Danius, Rick Wilking, Sara Danius, Jonas Ekstromer, Jenny Sundén, Trump, Moss, Sundén, It’s, ” McLemore Organizations: CNN, British, Democratic National Conference, CBS, Milan Fashion, PBS, Democratic Rep, Supreme, Swedish Academy, Washington University, Getty, Södertörn University, “, Stock Exchange, Fortune Locations: British, Newburgh, ” New York, Sweden, St, Louis , Missouri, Stockholm, AFP, America

The new nine-month Supreme Court term officially starts Monday, with the justices appearing in the courtroom to hear oral arguments. Major cases at the Supreme Court: U.S. v. Skrmetti — Challenge to state laws that ban gender-affirming care for trans teenagers. When the Supreme Court decided Bush v. Gore, its reputation took a hit but quickly rebounded. Republicans challenged those changes, but the Supreme Court never took up a case about the issue at the time. The Supreme Court has relatively few cases of consequence on the argument calendar so far.

Persons: WASHINGTON —, Donald Trump, Bush, Gore, George W, Joe Biden's, Nate Persily, Garland, Paxton, Richard Glossip's, Wade ., Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Franita Tolson, Zack Smith, Robert F, Kennedy Jr, Jill Stein, Elena Kagan Organizations: Republican, Stanford Law School, NBC, Trump, Supreme, Coalition, . Oklahoma, Democratic, Wade, University of Southern California Guild School of Law, Heritage Foundation, Green Party, New York University School of Law Locations: Texas, ., Oklahoma, In Pennsylvania, Georgia, DeKalb County, Roe, New York, Nevada, Arizona

☆ Marcellus Williams execution brings fresh scrutiny to Supreme Court’s death penalty approach
▼ + stars: | 2024-09-28 | by ( John Fritze | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +9 min

“The Supreme Court has a limited role to play death penalty cases,” said Paul Cassell, a University of Utah law professor who is representing a victim’s family in another death penalty case before the high court this year. Another involves an Alabama man who claims he is intellectually disabled and therefore ineligible for execution under Supreme Court precedent. The Supreme Court’s approach to death penalty appeals is “to correct severe misapplications of constitutional law by America’s state court systems,” said Seth Kretzer, a Texas attorney who has represented death row inmates at the Supreme Court. Alabama is appealing that decision to the Supreme Court and has been waiting more than year for an answer. In Oklahoma, Brenda Andrew faces the death penalty for the 2001 shooting death of her estranged husband.

Persons: Marcellus Williams, Felicia Gayle, Williams, ”, Cliff Sloan, “, dissents, Paul Cassell, Cassell, Richard Glossip, Barry Van Treese, Justin Sneed, Glossip, Sneed, Republican Gentner Drummond, ” Williams, Wesley Bell, Bell, Andrew Bailey, Bailey, Robert Dunham, ” Cassell, Van, ’, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson –, Sotomayor, Kenneth Smith, Smith, ” Smith, Seth Kretzer, Kretzer, Joseph Smith, Brenda Andrew, Andrew, ” CNN’s Devan Cole Organizations: CNN, NAACP, Supreme, Georgetown Law, University of Utah, Republican, Glossip, Democrat, Missouri, Court, Eighth, Alabama, Appeals Locations: Missouri, Oklahoma, Alabama, Oklahoma City, Louis, Texas

☆ Marcellus Williams is executed despite prosecutors and the victim’s family asking that he be spared
▼ + stars: | 2024-09-24 | by ( Cindy Von Quednow | Holly Yan | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +11 min

Around 100 demonstrators were present on the prison grounds protesting capital punishment and Williams’ execution, Pojmann said. Williams’ team filed a clemency petition to the US Supreme Court last week, noting Missouri’s previous governor had postponed Williams’ execution indefinitely amid questions about the integrity of Williams’ trial. Eric Greitens previously halted Williams’ execution and formed a board to investigate his case and determine whether he should be granted clemency. “The Board investigated Williams’ case for the next six years — until Governor Michael Parson abruptly terminated the process,” Williams’ attorneys wrote. “The Governor’s actions have violated Williams’ constitutional rights and created an exceptionally urgent need for the Court’s attention,” Williams’ attorneys said in court documents.

Persons: Marcellus Williams, Williams, Williiams, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Felicia Gayle, Gayle’s, Mike Parson, Trevor Foley, “, Larry Komp, ” Komp, Tricia Rojo Bushnell, CNN’s Jake Tapper, doesn’t, Governor Parson, Parson, Louis County, Williams ’, ” Williams, Karen Pojmann, Imam Jalahii Kacem, Pojmann, Andrew Bailey, Wesley Bell, Louis, ” Bailey, Jonathan Potts, Michael Spillane, ” Spillane, “ Mr, ” Parson, ”, – Williams, Alford, general’s, Eric Greitens, Michael Parson, ” CNN’s Dakin Andone, Lauren Mascarenhas, John Fritze, Jennifer Hauser Organizations: CNN, US, ”, Missouri Department of Corrections, NAACP, Williams, of Corrections, Attorney’s Office, Missouri Attorney General’s, Jail, Court, Missouri Supreme, Republican Gov, Supreme, Attorney’s, GOP Gov Locations: Missouri, Bonne Terre, St, Louis

☆ How Samuel Alito got canceled from the Supreme Court social media majority
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-31 | by ( Joan Biskupic | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +15 min

Behind the scenes, the conservative justice sought to put a thumb on the scale for states trying to restrict how social media companies filter content. The states enacted their laws in 2021 and, with variations, restricted the ability of social media platforms to filter third-party messages, videos and other content. Greg Abbott signed that state’s measure, he said, “there is a dangerous movement by social media companies to silence conservative viewpoints and ideas.” In Florida, Gov. Kagan added a footnote to her majority opinion buttressing that point and reinforcing Barrett’s view. But, despite Alito’s protest, Kagan had a majority signing her decision, which, at minimum, offers lower court judges a strong indication of the framework the high court majority would use in future online challenges.

Persons: Samuel Alito, Alito, Amy Coney Barrett, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Justice Elena Kagan, Donald Trump, Joe Biden, SCOTUS, Trump, Greg Abbott, ”, Ron DeSantis, Andrew Oldham, Kevin Newsom, Newsom, Feedback Alito, NetChoice, unconstitutionality, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Barrett, Jackson, Kagan, John Roberts, Sonia Sotomayor, Brett Kavanaugh, ” Barrett, Justice Roberts, CNN Jackson, “, ” Kagan, –, Thomas, Gorsuch, Sylvia Gonzalez, Gonzalez’s, Gonzalez, Trevino, Alito’s, haven’t, Republican Trump, Judge Oldham Organizations: CNN, New York Times, Democratic, Trump, Facebook, Twitter, Texas Gov, Gov, Big Tech, Texas, Appeals, Oldham, YouTube, Chief, Supreme, Circuit, Republican Locations: Texas, Trump, SCOTUS The Texas, Florida

☆ The inside story of John Roberts and Trump’s immunity win at the Supreme Court
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-30 | by ( Joan Biskupic | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +13 min

This exclusive series on the Supreme Court is based on CNN sources inside and outside the court with knowledge of the deliberations. Justices weren’t in a hurry to hear the caseThe immunity case first arrived at the justices’ door in December. Perhaps, she hoped to influence lower court judges to read the Roberts opinion as more flexible for a future prosecution. It was a particularly extreme section of Roberts’ opinion – decided by the kind of 5-4 vote the chief justice usually tried to avoid. He fully joined Roberts’ opinion but then questioned the constitutionality of the special counsel’s office.

Persons: John Roberts ’, Donald Trump, Roberts, justice’s, admonishing Trump, Bush, Clinton, ”, Trump, ” Roberts, Jack Smith, Fischer, Samuel Alito, Roberts tersely, Clarence Thomas, weren’t, Smith, Adam Feldman, Jake Truscott, EmpiricalSCOTUS, Roberts ’, Ronald Reagan, George H.W, Brett Kavanaugh, George W, Reagan, SCOTUS, Roe, Wade, Dobbs, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Barrett, Trump’s, –, Thomas, Thomas ’, Aileen Cannon, Trump . Thomas Organizations: CNN, Republican, Trump, Manhattan, Capitol, U.S . Capitol Police, New England Law Boston, Jackson, Health Organization, Liberal, Trump . Locations: Trump, Washington, rejoinder, United States, Galway, Ireland, Iran, Colorado

☆ Inside the Supreme Court’s compromise on Idaho’s abortion ban
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-29 | by ( Joan Biskupic | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +13 min

Instead, a series of negotiations led to an eventual compromise decision limiting the Idaho law and temporarily forestalling further limits on abortion access from the high court. This exclusive series on the Supreme Court is based on CNN sources inside and outside the court with knowledge of the deliberations. The Idaho law had exemptions only to prevent death of the pregnant woman and in instances of rape or incest. It issued formal guidance saying the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), which requires stabilizing treatment regardless of a patient’s ability to pay, would preempt any state abortion ban in situations when an emergency termination was needed. Idaho lost in an initial proceeding in a US district court, as a judge issued a temporary injunction against the abortion ban.

Persons: Roe, Wade, Biden, John Roberts, SCOTUS, Elizabeth Prelogar, Idaho’s, Amy Coney Barrett, ”, Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh, Barrett, “ improvidently, ” Barrett, Kavanaugh, ’, Elena Kagan, ‘, – Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Alito, Thomas, Sonia Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson, Sotomayor, Ketanji Brown Jackson, “, ” Alito, ” Jackson Organizations: CNN, Supreme, Republican, Democratic, Labor, Justice Department, Idaho, United, Jackson, Health Locations: Idaho, EMTALA . Idaho, SCOTUS Idaho, Sacramento, Dobbs v, Moyle v, United States

The reforms, which will face heavy resistance, are meant to “restore trust and accountability when it comes to the presidency and the United States Supreme Court,” the White House official said. CNN reported this month that Biden was seriously considering endorsing major Supreme Court reforms, actions that liberal lawmakers and groups have been pushing in recent years. The group submitted its report to the White House in late 2021, but the administration did not pursue any of the ideas discussed in the document. The debate over proposed structural changes at the Supreme Court has become deeply partisan, with Republicans widely opposed. He has described the Supreme Court as “out of kilter” and has warned of the impact a second Trump presidency could have on the nation’s highest court.

Persons: Joe Biden, Donald Trump –, Biden, ”, Samuel Alito, Alito, Elena Kagan, Roe, Wade –, Kamala Harris, Trump, Lyndon B, Johnson, MJ Lee, Devan Cole Organizations: CNN, White House, Supreme, Civil, Democrats, Senate, United States Supreme, White, Trump, Liberal, Marquette Law School, Democratic, Committee Locations: Austin , Texas

☆ How the Current Supreme Court Would Look Under Biden’s Term-Limit Plan
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-29 | by ( Elena Shao | ) www.nytimes.com time to read: +2 min

How the Current Supreme Court Would Look Under Biden’s Term-Limit PlanIn an opinion essay published on Monday, President Biden proposed two major changes to the Supreme Court: 18-year term limits for justices and a binding code of conduct. Under Mr. Biden’s term-limit plan, presidents would appoint a new Supreme Court justice every two years. Bush era) 1991 By The New York TimesThe Supreme Court now includes six conservative justices, appointed by former Presidents Donald J. Trump, George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush, as well as three liberal ones, appointed by Mr. Biden and former President Barack Obama. The overhaul would require congressional approval, which is not expected to come from a Republican-controlled House and a divided Senate.

Persons: Biden, Democrat Biden, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Amy Coney Barrett, Republican Trump Brett M, Kavanaugh Neil M, Gorsuch, Obama Elena Kagan Sonia Sotomayor, Samuel A, Alito, Jr, Bush John G, Roberts, Clarence Thomas, H.W, Trump Brett M, Donald J, Trump, George W, Bush, George H.W, George H.W . Bush, Mr, Barack Obama Organizations: Supreme, Democrat, Republican Trump, Democratic, Republican, The New York Times Locations: George H.W .

☆ Justice Elena Kagan says Supreme Court’s code of conduct needs an enforcement plan. Takeaways from her wide-ranging comments.
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-25 | by ( Devan Cole | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +11 min

Sacramento, California CNN —Justice Elena Kagan on Thursday defended the code of conduct the Supreme Court created last year, but conceded there needs to be a way to enforce the rules for it to be more effective. “I think that the rules that we put out are good ones,” Kagan said at a judicial conference in Sacramento. “I think that the thing that can be criticized is, you know, rules usually have enforcement mechanisms attached to them. Justice Scalia and Justice Ginsburg pose on an elephant in Rajistan during their tour of India in 1994. Collection of the Supreme Court of the United StatesBut asked on Thursday whether she thought collegiality is important for the court, Kagan made clear that while she saw it as important, it shouldn’t ultimately matter to the public.

Persons: Elena Kagan, ” Kagan, Kagan, ”, “, ’, John Roberts, “ I’m, Roberts, Trump, Joe Biden, Feedback Biden, ‘, ’ ”, eked, Donald Trump’s, Barack Obama, Antonin Scalia, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Justice Scalia, Ginsburg, collegiality, shouldn’t Organizations: California CNN, Democratic, Judicial, Department, GOP, Biden, Department of Education, Trump, CNN Locations: Sacramento, California, Washington, Rajistan, India

☆ With Chevron reversal, Supreme Court paves way for a 'legal earthquake'
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-10 | by ( Josephine Rozzelle | ) www.cnbc.com time to read: +2 min

A general view of the U.S. Supreme Court as justices issue rulings in pending cases on the final day of the court's term in Washington, U.S., July 1, 2024. This batch of cases may be the first indication of the legal upheaval that could play out across the United States judiciary now that one of the most widely cited Supreme Court opinions has been reversed. "The majority's decision today will cause a massive shock to the legal system," Justice Elena Kagan wrote in her dissenting opinion. It also called into question the fate of the more than 19,000 past federal cases which cite the precedent. The Supreme Court protected agencies' past actions, Coglianese explained, but it said little about the agencies' past interpretations of laws, leaving the door cracked open for prior cases to be challenged.

Persons: Raimondo, Elena Kagan, John Roberts, Roberts, Cary Coglianese, Coglianese Organizations: U.S, Supreme, Loper Bright Enterprises, Chevron, United, Natural Resources Defense, University of Pennsylvania, Penn Locations: Washington , U.S, United States, Chevron v

☆ When the Supreme Court Gets Mixed Up With Trump Derangement Syndrome - The New York Times
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-05 | by ( William Baude | ) www.nytimes.com time to read: +1 min

At the end of another momentous term, the Supreme Court has issued major rulings that will reshape the law. For the most part, this criticism does not give the Supreme Court enough credit. In case after case, it has rightly emphasized the importance of turning to historical understandings in deciding constitutional cases rather than imposing modern policy views. Most of the court’s decisions are principled and sound — most but unfortunately not all. Still, for most of the term, the court based its decisions on historical understandings.

Persons: Donald Trump, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Biden Organizations: Appeals, Ninth Circuit

☆ Supreme Court dissents take a 'darker tone' on Trump immunity ruling
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-01 | by ( Rebecca Picciotto | ) www.cnbc.com time to read: +2 min

Supreme Court Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Ketanji Brown Jackson and Elena Kagan laid out grim visions of U.S. democracy in their joint written dissents to the court's Monday decision on former President Donald Trump's claim of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution. "In every use of official power, the President is now a king above the law," Sotomayor wrote. It's more of a warning," LaCroix told CNBC in an interview about the three dissents, written by the only three justices nominated to the court by Democratic presidents. The immediate effect was to send special counsel Jack Smith's criminal election fraud case against Trump back to U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan. She will have to rule on whether the criminal charges pertain to official acts Trump carried out as president, granting him immunity, or his private conduct.

Persons: Sonia Sotomayor, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Elena Kagan, Donald Trump's, Sotomayor, Jackson, Alison LaCroix, LaCroix, Jack, Tanya Chutkan, Trump Organizations: University of Chicago, CNBC, Democratic, Trump, Republicans Locations: U.S

☆ Vehement Dissent From Supreme Court’s Liberal Wing Laments Vast Expansion of Presidential Power
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-01 | by ( Charlie Savage | More About Charlie Savage | ) www.nytimes.com time to read: +1 min

The Supreme Court’s three Democratic appointees railed in dissent against the conservative majority’s ruling that former President Donald J. Trump has some immunity for his official actions, declaring that their colleagues had made the president into “a king above the law.”Writing that the majority was “deeply wrong,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor added that beyond its consequences for the bid to prosecute Mr. Trump for his attempt to subvert the outcome of the 2020 election, it would have “stark” long-term consequences for the future of American democracy. “The court effectively creates a law-free zone around the president, upsetting the status quo that has existed since the founding,” she wrote, in an opinion joined by the other two Democratic appointees, Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Insulating the president of the United States — the most powerful person in the country and possibly the world, she noted — from criminal prosecution when he uses his official powers will allow him to freely use his official power to violate the law, exploit the trappings of his office for personal gain, or other “evil ends.”

Persons: Donald J, Trump, Sonia Sotomayor, Mr, ”, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson Organizations: Democratic, United Locations: “, United States

☆ Supreme Court Declines to Rule on Tech Platforms’ Free Speech Rights
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-01 | by ( Adam Liptak | Abbie Vansickle | ) www.nytimes.com time to read: +1 min

Instead, the justices unanimously agreed to return the cases to lower courts for analysis. In the majority opinion, Justice Elena Kagan wrote that neither lower appeals court had properly analyzed the First Amendment challenges to the Florida and Texas laws. The laws were prompted in part by the decisions of some platforms to bar President Donald J. Trump after the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol. Supporters of the laws said they were an attempt to combat what they called Silicon Valley censorship. The laws, they added, fostered free speech, giving the public access to all points of view.

Persons: Elena Kagan, Donald J, Trump Organizations: Republicans, Capitol Locations: Florida, Texas

☆ Big Tech gets a big win from the Supreme Court
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-01 | by ( Grace Eliza Goodwin | ) www.businessinsider.com time to read: +6 min

Read previewThe Supreme Court isn't willing to blow up the internet just yet. The Texas law applied to social media companies with at least 50 million users, while Florida included companies with over 100 million users. As Judge Andrew Oldham wrote in his appeals court decision upholding the Texas law, the Florida law "prohibits all censorship of some speakers," while the Texas law "prohibits some censorship of all speakers." Part of the reason the Supreme Court might have agreed to hear the cases to begin with is because there was a circuit split between the states. But Calvert said on Monday that because the high court's decision is so favorable to the social media companies, that's not likely to happen.

Persons: —, isn't, Paxton, Florida's Moody, NetChoice —, Donald Trump, Andrew Oldham, Clay Calvert, Calvert, Elena Kagan, Kagan, Ken Paxton, Ashley Moody ., that's Organizations: Service, Business, Facebook, Twitter, Capitol, Republicans, Meta, Google, Appeals, Circuit Locations: Texas, Florida

☆ Sotomayor says the president can now 'assassinate a political rival' without facing prosecution
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-01 | by ( Bryan Metzger | Natalie Musumeci | ) www.businessinsider.com time to read: +3 min

Read previewIn her dissenting opinion to the Supreme Court's ruling on presidential immunity, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said that the conservative majority had enabled presidents to assassinate political rivals without fear of criminal prosecution. Related stories"When he uses his official powers in any way, under the majority's reasoning, he now will be insulated from criminal prosecution," Sotomayor wrote. Immune, immune, immune." Trump's lawyers had argued that he was immune from criminal prosecution over those efforts because they fell within the scope of his official duties. AdvertisementFormer federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani disagreed with Sotomayer, saying that there would be no presidential immunity for extreme circumstances like ordering the assassination of a political rival.

Persons: —, Sonia Sotomayor, Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Donald Trump, Neama Rahmani, Sotomayer Organizations: Service, Business, Trump, Justice Department, Trump electors

But the court’s opinion also makes clear that this ruling is not a death knell for Smith’s case. Smith charged Trump with engaging in a “criminal scheme” to subvert the 2020 election; Trump has pleaded not guilty to four counts. In Nixon v. Fitzgerald, the Supreme Court held that a president enjoyed civil immunity for all “official acts.” Now, in Trump v. United States, the court grappled with which “official” acts should also receive criminal immunity. In order to settle the extent of Trump’s immunity, Chutkan should expeditiously schedule the mini-trial to hear witness testimony and receive other relevant evidence from both parties. In response to Trump’s assertion of civil immunity there, the DC Circuit put in place a lengthy discovery schedule for the lower court to determine the extent of Trump’s civil immunity.

Persons: Norman Eisen, “, Donald Trump, Danya Perry, Joshua Kolb, Neil Gorsuch, Jack Smith’s, Donald Trump’s, Norm Eisen, Tanya Chutkan, Smith, Trump, Nixon, Fitzgerald, —, Joshua Kolb CJ, John Roberts, Justice Department —, Mike Pence, Mark Meadows, Jeffrey Clark —, Clark, Steve Jones, Meadows, Brad Raffensperger, Jones, Meadows’s, Sotomayor, Chutkan, Pence, Bill Barr —, Trump’s, slimming, ”, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson Organizations: CNN, Perry Law, Division, Southern, of, State, Moreland Commission, Nixon, Trump v ., Justice Department, Trump, White, Trump administration, Georgia, Meadows, Circuit, Congress, Capitol Police, Capitol, DC Circuit, Twitter Locations: of New York, New York, Moreland, Trump v, Trump v . United States, Georgia, Fulton, Meadows

☆ Supreme Court Extends Time Frame for Challenges to Regulations
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-01 | by ( Adam Liptak | More About Adam Liptak | ) www.nytimes.com time to read: +2 min

The case on time limits, Corner Post v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, No. 22-1008, arose from a challenge to a 2011 regulation of debit-card swipe fees brought by two trade associations in 2021. The amended suit said Corner Post could not have sued within the six-year period after the issuance of the regulation because it did not yet exist. “Has the Justice Department and the agencies considered whether there is any interaction between these two challenges?” Justice Kagan asked. The lawyer, Benjamin W. Snyder, responded, “I want to be careful here.”Then he added that the consequences could be enormous.

Persons: Elena Kagan, “, ” Justice Kagan, Benjamin W, Snyder, ” Organizations: Governors, Federal Reserve, N.D, Chevron, Natural Resources Defense Council, Justice Department Locations: Watford City, Chevron

☆ Opinion | The Supreme Court Puts the Pro-Life Movement to the Test
▼ + stars: | 2024-06-30 | by ( David French | ) www.nytimes.com time to read: +1 min

Rarely has a Supreme Court case had less legal meaning and greater moral weight than the decision Thursday morning in Moyle v. United States. The case was of such little legal consequence that you might have already forgotten about it; you’ve lost it in the haze of a shocking presidential debate and a host of far more consequential Supreme Court decisions. But Moyle illuminates a deep conflict within the anti-abortion movement, and the way the pro-life movement resolves that conflict will affect American life and politics for decades to come. The court dismissed the case as “improvidently granted.” In plain English, it means that it never should have taken the case in the first place. Even though Justices Elena Kagan,Amy Coney Barrett and Samuel Alito wrote their own opinions, those opinions do not bind the lower courts the way a true Supreme Court majority opinion binds every federal court.

Persons: you’ve, Moyle, “ improvidently, Elena Kagan, Amy Coney Barrett, Samuel Alito, ”, Reagan Organizations: Labor Locations: Moyle v, United States, Idaho

CNN —A major Supreme Court ruling Friday that shifted power from the executive branch to the judiciary stands to transform how the federal government works. By overturning a 1984 precedent, the court’s conservative majority has made countless regulations vulnerable to legal challenge. The Supreme Court ruling could boost efforts by conservatives who have taken aim at the Biden Environmental Protection Agency’s rules limiting planet-warming pollution from vehicles, oil and gas wells and pipelines, and power plants. The ruling has injected legal uncertainty into regulations of all types, including those on technology, labor, the environment and health care. But the Supreme Court has yet to decide a case heard this term that might gut that limitation.

Persons: ”, Kent Barnett, —, Thomas Berry, John Roberts, Roberts, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, Joe Biden, Shawn ThewPool, Adam Rust, ” Rust, Andrew Schwartzman, Alexander MacDonald, ” MacDonald, Sharon Block, ” Block, Biden, Andrew Twinamatsiko, ” Twinamatsiko, “, Paul Gallant, TD Cowen, David Vladeck, Chevron —, Ann Carlson, Carlson, David Doniger Organizations: CNN, Biden, University of Georgia School of Law, Chevron, Natural Resources Defense, Republican, Democratic, Cato Institute . Chief, State of, Consumer, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Federal Trade Commission, Consumer Federation of America, “, Supreme, Securities, Exchange Commission, Benton Institute for Broadband & Society, Department of Labor, National Labor Relations Board, Opportunity Commission, Harvard Law School, Center, Labor, American Cancer Society, US Food and Drug Administration, US Department of Health, Human Services, Medicare, Services, Medicaid, Human Services Department, HHS, O’Neill Institute for National, Global Health Law, Georgetown University, FDA, Federal Communications Commission, EPA, National, Traffic Safety Administration, University of California, Natural Resources Defense Council Locations: Obamacare, Chevron, State, Washington , DC, Texas, Littler, Los Angeles

☆ Oral dissents are back in vogue at the Supreme Court as liberals lament latest rulings
▼ + stars: | 2024-06-29 | by ( Joan Biskupic | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +9 min

CNN —As the conservative Supreme Court majority has won case after case in recent days, liberal dissenters are having their moment in the courtroom. Other justices stared out at spectators or down at notes, perhaps anticipating the next opinions, and dissents, to be revealed. The court majority reversed a 1984 milestone that required judges to defer to reasonable agency interpretations of their congressional mandates. Her oral dissent lasted nearly 15 minutes, about five minutes longer than Roberts’ rendition of the majority opinion. They begin with the author of the majority opinion delivering the facts of the case, law involved, and the resolution.

Persons: Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Neil Gorsuch, Sotomayor, ”, “, ” Gorsuch, John Roberts, Kagan, Roberts, They’ve, Kagan’s, ” Kagan, Roe, Wade, Gorsuch, Sotomayor’s, Antonin Scalia, Jackson, Amy Coney Barrett, Barrett, improvidently, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, ” Alito, Biden, chiding Organizations: CNN, Friday, Natural Resources Defense, “, Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, US Justice Department, Labor, Conservative Locations: Oregon, Grants, American, Idaho

Search resuls for: "Elena Kagan"

25 mentions found