DIRS.INFO The most relevant business & tech news

☆ Appeals court denies Peter Navarro’s bid to avoid reporting to prison next week
▼ + stars: | 2024-03-14 | by ( Devan Cole | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +2 min

CNN —A federal appeals court on Thursday denied ex-Donald Trump adviser Peter Navarro’s bid to avoid reporting to a federal prison next week to begin serving a four-month sentence for his contempt of Congress conviction. The unanimous decision from the DC Circuit Court of Appeals means Navarro will have to report to a federal prison in Miami by March 19. Trump promotes Navarro’s bookTrump was promoting Navarro’s book in recent days and backing his effort to avoid jail time. “Peter Navarro had strong views on Protecting our Economy against the assault from Foreign Countries all over the World. Peter Navarro is a Patriot who has been treated very badly, but he continues forward.

Persons: Donald Trump, Peter Navarro’s, Navarro, Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard, Robert Wilkins, Navarro hadn’t, “, ” Navarro, Navarro “, ”, Trump, “ Peter Navarro, ‘, Peter, Peter Navarro, ” Trump, CNN’s Kate Sullivan Organizations: CNN, DC, Capitol, Foreign, U.S, Patriot Locations: Miami

☆ Trump gag order appeal faces skeptical reception in US court
▼ + stars: | 2023-11-20 | by ( Mike Scarcella | Companies Need To Integrate Climate Reporting Across Functions To Comply With California S New Law | Henry Engler | ) www.reuters.com time to read: +4 min

Trump is the current frontrunner for the Republican nomination to challenge Democratic President Joe Biden in the 2024 U.S. election. As he mounts his comeback bid, Trump has leveled attacks on prosecutors, court officials and others involved in the welter of criminal and civil cases he faces. The judge has forbidden Trump and his lawyers to criticize prosecutors, court staff and potential witnesses. BAN IN SEPARATE TRIAL LIFTEDA similar restriction in a separate civil business fraud case in New York was temporarily lifted by a state appeals court judge last week. Trump promptly resumed his attacks on a court clerk involved in the case.

Persons: Donald Trump, Greg Abbott, Go Nakamura, Donald Trump's, D, John Sauer, Trump's, Cornelia Pillard, Sauer, Cecil VanDevender, Trump, Joe Biden, Jack Smith, General Merrick Garland, Smith, Tanya Chutkan, Biden's, Mike Scarcella, Andy Sullivan, Will Dunham, Jonathan Oatis Organizations: Republican, Texas, REUTERS, Go, Rights, Trump, U.S ., Appeals, District of Columbia, Justice, Democratic, U.S, Biden, Thomson Locations: Edinburg , Texas, U.S, Washington, New York, Georgia

A panel of Washington, D.C. federal appeals court judges was highly skeptical of arguments Monday by a lawyer for Donald Trump that the former president is being unconstitutionally silenced by a gag order in his criminal election interference case. Sauer replied that "the showing would have to be extraordinarily compelling" in order to justify restricting Trump's speech. Trump was slapped with the gag order last month by U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who said his statements targeting people involved in the case posed "sufficiently grave threats to the integrity of these proceedings." Chutkan's gag order barred Trump from making public statements targeting his prosecutors and "reasonably foreseeable" witnesses regarding the substance of their testimony. Trump has pleaded not guilty to the four-count indictment charging him with crimes including conspiracy to defraud the United States.

Persons: Jack Smith, Donald Trump, Trump, Dean Sauer, Joe Biden, Sauer, Tanya Chutkan, Patricia Millet, Cornelia Pillard, Barack Obama, Bradley Garcia Organizations: U.S, Trump, College, Biden Locations: Washington ,, Palm Beach , Florida, United States

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal appeals court is hearing arguments Monday on whether to reinstate a gag order against Donald Trump in the federal case charging him with plotting to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. The prosecutors say those restrictions are necessary to prevent Trump from undermining confidence in the court system and intimidating people who may be called to testify against him. The gag order is one of multiple contentious issues being argued ahead of the landmark March 2024 trial. Political Cartoons View All 1256 ImagesThe judge lifted it days after entering it, giving Trump's lawyers time to prove why his words should not be restricted. Should the judges rule against Trump, he'll have the option of asking the entire court to take up the matter.

Persons: Donald Trump, Jack Smith's, Trump, Tanya Chutkan, Smith, Chutkan, Cornelia Pillard, Patricia Millett, Barack Obama, Brad Garcia, Joe Biden Organizations: WASHINGTON, —, Prosecutors, Trump, U.S, Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, he'll, House Locations: Washington

☆ Trump should be allowed to pressure witnesses in his election interference case depending on 'the context,' his lawyer tells judges
▼ + stars: | 2023-11-20 | by ( Jacob Shamsian | ) www.businessinsider.com time to read: +7 min

Trump's legal team argued against his gag order in his upcoming election interference trial. AdvertisementA panel of three judges on Monday appeared highly skeptical of arguments from Donald Trump's legal team seeking to revoke a gag order that bars him from attacking potential witnesses in his election interference criminal case. Depending on "the context," Lauro argued, Trump would be permitted to pressure possible witnesses not to cooperate with prosecutors. The gag order in the election interference case is separate from a gag order in another ongoing civil trial against Trump in New York. He found that Trump violated it earlier in November, though an appeals court on Thursday temporarily lifted the order.

Persons: Trump, —, Donald Trump's, John Lauro, Lauro, Patricia Millet, X, Mike Pence, — Lauro, Tanya Chutkan, they've, Sam Bankman, Cornelia Pillard, Laura, Jack Smith, Mark Meadows, weaklings, Chutkan, MANDEL NGAN, Millet, Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Smith, Cecil Woods VanDevender, Bill Barr, We've, Judge Arthur Engoron Organizations: Prosecutors, Service, United States, Appeals, DC Circuit, Trump, US, Capitol, Justice Department, Republican, Getty Locations: New York, FTX, AFP

☆ Trump to test the limits of the First Amendment at high-stakes hearing over constitutionality of gag order
▼ + stars: | 2023-11-19 | by ( Devan Cole | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +8 min

The gag order from District Judge Tanya Chutkan restricts Trump’s ability to publicly target court personnel, potential witnesses, special counsel Jack Smith and his staff. The appeals court has temporarily frozen the gag order as Trump continues to contest it. “The Gag Order violates President Trump’s most fundamental First Amendment rights. The former president was recently under a gag order in the $250 million New York state civil fraud case. “The entire Gag Order rests on an unconstitutional ‘heckler’s veto’ theory, so it is overbroad in its entirety.”Trump’s arguments were not persuasive when he tried to have Chutkan pause the gag order while his appeal unfolded.

Persons: Donald Trump, Tanya Chutkan, Jack Smith, Trump, Trump’s, ”, Catherine Ross, ” Ross, –, Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard, Barack Obama, Brad Garcia, Joe Biden –, Smith, Chutkan, “ Trump, Millett, Judge Pillard –, Evan Corcoran, Corcoran Organizations: CNN, US DC Circuit, Prosecutors, George Washington University Law School, Trump, DC Circuit, Supreme, ” Prosecutors, American Civil Liberties Union, Court Locations: Washington, York, Mar

☆ Appeals court freezes gag order against Trump in federal election subversion case and will hear oral arguments this month
▼ + stars: | 2023-11-03 | by ( Devan Cole | Katelyn | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +3 min

CNN —A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily froze the limited gag order issued against Donald Trump in the former president’s election subversion criminal case in Washington, DC, allowing him to again speak freely with criticism of possible witnesses in the case. Now, the appeals court will consider whether it will grant relief to the former president in the matter. “The prosecution’s request for a Gag Order bristles with hostility to President Trump’s viewpoint and his relentless criticism of the government—including of the prosecution itself,” Trump’s attorneys told the appeals court in a filing Thursday. “The Gag Order embodies this unconstitutional hostility to President Trump’s viewpoint. It should be immediately stayed.”The order restricts Trump’s ability to publicly target court personnel, potential witnesses, or the special counsel and his staff.

Persons: Donald Trump, Tanya Chutkan, Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard, Obama, Brad Garcia, Joe Biden, –, Trump, Chutkan, Jack Smith’s, Mark Meadows, ”, “, Trump’s Organizations: CNN, US DC Circuit, Appeals, Department, Justice Department Locations: Washington , DC, Washington

Special counsel Jack Smith, at the beginning of 2023, obtained a search warrant for the Twitter account of Donald Trump as part of his criminal investigation into the former president's effort to reverse his loss in the 2020 election, a federal appeals court decision revealed Wednesday. The appeals court ruling says Twitter completed its production of Trump's account information for Smith's office on Feb. 9. And Twitter argued that by keeping the warrant secret from Trump, he would be unable to shield communications made using his Twitter account from prosecutors by asserting executive privilege. The unanimous ruling against the company on all points was issued by a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Twitter was bought last year by Elon Musk, the billionaire who also heads Tesla , and SpaceX.

Persons: Jack Smith, Donald Trump, Twitter, Trump, Michelle Childs, Florence Pan, Joe Biden, Cornelia Pillard, Barack Obama, Elon Musk, Tesla, Joe Biden's DOJ Organizations: Twitter, Trump, Communications, U.S, Court, Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, SpaceX

Kannon Shanmugam of Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison represented PayPal, while CFPB senior counsel Christopher Deal represented the regulator. The CFPB created its Prepaid Rule to offer consumers legal protections on prepaid accounts similar to those on products such as checking accounts, including the ability to challenge payment errors, unauthorized transactions and fraud. Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan and Circuit Judge Cornelia Pillard joined Rao's decision. The appeals court returned the case to Leon to consider PayPal's other challenges to the Prepaid Rule, including constitutional and administrative law claims. Circuit Court of Appeals, No.

Garvey had argued that the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX), which protects workers who report securities violations, can apply to securities fraud that occurs overseas but affects U.S. markets. Circuit said SOX's whistleblower protections do not prohibit securities fraud, so any impact on the U.S. was irrelevant in applying the law. Nor did Morgan Stanley, which has denied retaliating against Garvey. An administrative law judge ruled that SOX did not apply to overseas workers, and a review board agreed last year. For Garvey: pro seFor DOL: Reynaldo FuentesFor Morgan Stanley: Michael Kenneally of Morgan Lewis & BockiusOur Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Search resuls for: "Cornelia Pillard"

10 mentions found