Top related persons:
Top related locs:
Top related orgs:

Search resuls for: "Center for Consumer"


5 mentions found


A Missouri court will hear oral arguments for Biden's SAVE student-loan repayment plan on October 24. The SAVE plan has been blocked for months following challenges from GOP state attorneys general. The case now sits with the 8th Circuit, and the Supreme Court urged for a quick decision. AdvertisementMillions of student-loan borrowers are getting a step closer to a court ruling on cheaper payments and debt relief. Advertisement"An appellate court has to apply the law from the US Supreme Court," Nahmias said.
Persons: , Biden, Mohela, David Nahmias, Nahmias Organizations: SAVE, 8th Circuit, Service, Education Department, GOP, Federal Government, UC Berkeley Center, Consumer Law, Economic, US, Circuit, Federal Student Aid Locations: Missouri, Mohela
Groups connected to the meat industry have said for years that plant-based meats aren't healthy. But it also counters one of the most common criticisms of plant-based meats from the animal meat industry – that these products are highly processed and unhealthy to eat. The Center has ties to the meat industry, according to Fast Company. In its own ads and messaging, the Center said that plant-based meat was "ultra-processed" and that the products posed health risks. The ad comes as Beyond Meat, Impossible, and other plant-based meat makers deal with a slump in sales.
Persons: Steven, Rick Berman, John Mackey Organizations: Service, Fast Company, Center for Consumer, Center, Foods, American Heart Association Locations: North Dakota, Wall, Silicon
Critics have said such awards encourage frivolous lawsuits and excessive fees going to class action attorneys who may seek to benefit their own interests instead. The Supreme Court in 2019 sidestepped resolving a challenge to cy pres awards in a case involving Google. Conservative Justice Clarence Thomas, dissenting in that case, called cy pres settlements "unfair and unreasonable." Monsanto has called the group, which advocates against what it considers abusive class action procedures, a "serial objector to class-action settlements." The group said in court papers that further steps could have taken to distribute the settlement award to class members.
Some legal experts say the lawsuit's standing is questionable due to MOHELA's involvement. The latter case has had some legal experts particularly confounded due to the central role MOHELA has taken in the case. "There's no threat that Missouri may suffer harm to the Lewis and Clark fund when the Lewis and Clark fund hasn't been paid into for over a decade," Nahmias said. Even two law professors who believe Biden's plan to cancel student debt broadly is illegal aren't convinced by the states' lawsuit. "On one hand, when the state created MOHELA over 40 years ago, it made clear that MOHELA is separate," Nahmias said.
Over a dozen groups filed amicus briefs to SCOTUS supporting Biden's student-debt relief. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona said in a statement that they reflect "the strength of our legal positions versus the fundamentally flawed lawsuits aimed at denying millions of working and middle-class borrowers debt relief." "As these diverse groups made clear today, student loan borrowers from all walks of life suffered profound financial harms during the pandemic and their continued recovery and successful repayment hinges on the Biden Administration's student debt relief plan," Cardona said. "We will continue to defend our legal authority to provide the debt relief working and middle-class families clearly need and deserve." One of the lawsuits was filed by six Republican-led states who sued because they said the debt relief would hurt their states' tax revenues, along with that of MOHELA.
Total: 5