DIRS.INFO The most relevant business & tech news

☆ A judge who overturned a $72 million verdict against Boeing disclosed he bought and sold Boeing stock while hearing the case — but says his wife's IRA was to blame
▼ + stars: | 2024-08-21 | by ( Jack Newsham | ) www.businessinsider.com time to read: +5 min

Judge James Robart told Business Insider a bank that managed his wife's individual retirement account purchased Boeing stock in April 2023. He said as soon as he learned about it, he had the stocks sold; his financial disclosures said the shares were sold on two dates in May and June. Based on the prices that Boeing shares traded at on the days her IRA bought and sold the shares, at least one of the two sales was a money-loser, while the second could have been profitable. He and his family disposed of their Boeing shares more than a year before that decision. The amount of Boeing stock traded isn't much compared with Robart's total wealth.

Persons: —, Judge James Robart, Robart, it's, Clarence Thomas, Sonia Sotomayor's, Zunum, Bill Hodes, Gabe Roth, Roth, Charles Schwab, hasn't Organizations: Service, Boeing, Business, BI, Supreme, Street Journal Locations: Seattle

☆ An inside look at the Supreme Court and 3 key justices
▼ + stars: | 2024-08-03 | by ( Zachary B. Wolf | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +6 min

CNN —The US Supreme Court holds immense power over Americans’ lives but is incredibly tight-lipped about how it reaches decisions. Do they care about the perception that the Supreme Court is out of step with the country? How do you think that proposal is going over at the Supreme Court? WOLF: If Trump wins, do you expect any justices would retire? BISKUPIC: If Trump wins, the leading candidates for retirement would be Justices Clarence Thomas (age 76) and Alito (age 74).

Persons: ’, Joe Biden, Joan Biskupic, You’ve, Amy Coney Barrett, Samuel Alito, John Roberts, I’m, Barrett, Alito, WOLF, SCOTUS, Justice Barrett, Trump, Roberts, Donald Trump, Trumpism, Biden, Kamala Harris, Clarence Thomas, Harris, Sonia Sotomayor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Antonin Scalia, Ginsburg, Scalia, They’re Organizations: CNN, Supreme, Trump Locations: Idaho, Trump

☆ How Samuel Alito got canceled from the Supreme Court social media majority
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-31 | by ( Joan Biskupic | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +15 min

Behind the scenes, the conservative justice sought to put a thumb on the scale for states trying to restrict how social media companies filter content. The states enacted their laws in 2021 and, with variations, restricted the ability of social media platforms to filter third-party messages, videos and other content. Greg Abbott signed that state’s measure, he said, “there is a dangerous movement by social media companies to silence conservative viewpoints and ideas.” In Florida, Gov. Kagan added a footnote to her majority opinion buttressing that point and reinforcing Barrett’s view. But, despite Alito’s protest, Kagan had a majority signing her decision, which, at minimum, offers lower court judges a strong indication of the framework the high court majority would use in future online challenges.

Persons: Samuel Alito, Alito, Amy Coney Barrett, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Justice Elena Kagan, Donald Trump, Joe Biden, SCOTUS, Trump, Greg Abbott, ”, Ron DeSantis, Andrew Oldham, Kevin Newsom, Newsom, Feedback Alito, NetChoice, unconstitutionality, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Barrett, Jackson, Kagan, John Roberts, Sonia Sotomayor, Brett Kavanaugh, ” Barrett, Justice Roberts, CNN Jackson, “, ” Kagan, –, Thomas, Gorsuch, Sylvia Gonzalez, Gonzalez’s, Gonzalez, Trevino, Alito’s, haven’t, Republican Trump, Judge Oldham Organizations: CNN, New York Times, Democratic, Trump, Facebook, Twitter, Texas Gov, Gov, Big Tech, Texas, Appeals, Oldham, YouTube, Chief, Supreme, Circuit, Republican Locations: Texas, Trump, SCOTUS The Texas, Florida

☆ The inside story of John Roberts and Trump’s immunity win at the Supreme Court
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-30 | by ( Joan Biskupic | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +13 min

This exclusive series on the Supreme Court is based on CNN sources inside and outside the court with knowledge of the deliberations. Justices weren’t in a hurry to hear the caseThe immunity case first arrived at the justices’ door in December. Perhaps, she hoped to influence lower court judges to read the Roberts opinion as more flexible for a future prosecution. It was a particularly extreme section of Roberts’ opinion – decided by the kind of 5-4 vote the chief justice usually tried to avoid. He fully joined Roberts’ opinion but then questioned the constitutionality of the special counsel’s office.

Persons: John Roberts ’, Donald Trump, Roberts, justice’s, admonishing Trump, Bush, Clinton, ”, Trump, ” Roberts, Jack Smith, Fischer, Samuel Alito, Roberts tersely, Clarence Thomas, weren’t, Smith, Adam Feldman, Jake Truscott, EmpiricalSCOTUS, Roberts ’, Ronald Reagan, George H.W, Brett Kavanaugh, George W, Reagan, SCOTUS, Roe, Wade, Dobbs, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Barrett, Trump’s, –, Thomas, Thomas ’, Aileen Cannon, Trump . Thomas Organizations: CNN, Republican, Trump, Manhattan, Capitol, U.S . Capitol Police, New England Law Boston, Jackson, Health Organization, Liberal, Trump . Locations: Trump, Washington, rejoinder, United States, Galway, Ireland, Iran, Colorado

☆ How the Current Supreme Court Would Look Under Biden’s Term-Limit Plan
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-29 | by ( Elena Shao | ) www.nytimes.com time to read: +2 min

How the Current Supreme Court Would Look Under Biden’s Term-Limit PlanIn an opinion essay published on Monday, President Biden proposed two major changes to the Supreme Court: 18-year term limits for justices and a binding code of conduct. Under Mr. Biden’s term-limit plan, presidents would appoint a new Supreme Court justice every two years. Bush era) 1991 By The New York TimesThe Supreme Court now includes six conservative justices, appointed by former Presidents Donald J. Trump, George W. Bush and George H.W. Bush, as well as three liberal ones, appointed by Mr. Biden and former President Barack Obama. The overhaul would require congressional approval, which is not expected to come from a Republican-controlled House and a divided Senate.

Persons: Biden, Democrat Biden, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Amy Coney Barrett, Republican Trump Brett M, Kavanaugh Neil M, Gorsuch, Obama Elena Kagan Sonia Sotomayor, Samuel A, Alito, Jr, Bush John G, Roberts, Clarence Thomas, H.W, Trump Brett M, Donald J, Trump, George W, Bush, George H.W, George H.W . Bush, Mr, Barack Obama Organizations: Supreme, Democrat, Republican Trump, Democratic, Republican, The New York Times Locations: George H.W .

☆ Inside the Supreme Court’s compromise on Idaho’s abortion ban
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-29 | by ( Joan Biskupic | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +13 min

Instead, a series of negotiations led to an eventual compromise decision limiting the Idaho law and temporarily forestalling further limits on abortion access from the high court. This exclusive series on the Supreme Court is based on CNN sources inside and outside the court with knowledge of the deliberations. The Idaho law had exemptions only to prevent death of the pregnant woman and in instances of rape or incest. It issued formal guidance saying the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), which requires stabilizing treatment regardless of a patient’s ability to pay, would preempt any state abortion ban in situations when an emergency termination was needed. Idaho lost in an initial proceeding in a US district court, as a judge issued a temporary injunction against the abortion ban.

Persons: Roe, Wade, Biden, John Roberts, SCOTUS, Elizabeth Prelogar, Idaho’s, Amy Coney Barrett, ”, Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh, Barrett, “ improvidently, ” Barrett, Kavanaugh, ’, Elena Kagan, ‘, – Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Alito, Thomas, Sonia Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson, Sotomayor, Ketanji Brown Jackson, “, ” Alito, ” Jackson Organizations: CNN, Supreme, Republican, Democratic, Labor, Justice Department, Idaho, United, Jackson, Health Locations: Idaho, EMTALA . Idaho, SCOTUS Idaho, Sacramento, Dobbs v, Moyle v, United States

A U.S. marshal on a Supreme Court security detail shot and wounded an armed man who tried to carjack him early Friday near Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s home in northwest Washington, according to court documents. The marshal was sitting in an unmarked federal vehicle when a silver Toyota minivan pulled over next to him, according to court documents. Flowers through the window four times, hitting him in the mouth, according to the court documents. A second U.S. marshal from another vehicle also responded and fired his weapon, according to the Metropolitan Police Department. Flowers was charged with armed carjacking, carrying a pistol without a license, and possession of a large-capacity ammunition-feeding device.

Persons: Sonia Sotomayor’s, Flowers Organizations: Supreme, Toyota, Metropolitan Police Department Locations: U.S, Washington

☆ Suspected carjacker shot outside home of Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-09 | by ( Kevin Breuninger | ) www.cnbc.com time to read: +1 min

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor speaks during a service for retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor in the Great Hall at the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C., on Dec. 18, 2023. Marshal tasked with protecting Supreme Court justices' homes shot an alleged armed carjacker near the Washington residence of Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor last week, authorities said Tuesday. The suspect, 18-year-old Kentrell Flowers of Southeast D.C., allegedly pulled a handgun on the marshal, who was in a parked car in the Northwest section of the city around 1:15 a.m. The marshal drew his own gun and "fired several shots at the suspect," the MPD said. Another marshal in a separate vehicle also fired at Flowers, who suffered non-life-threatening injuries, police said.

Persons: Sonia Sotomayor, Sandra Day O'Connor, Flowers Organizations: Washington , D.C, U.S, Southeast D.C, Metropolitan Police Department, Police Locations: Washington ,, Washington, Southeast

☆ How Biden’s 2024 choice could reshape the Senate and Supreme Court for years
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-09 | by ( Ronald Brownstein | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +18 min

But recent history raises deep questions about whether Democratic Senate candidates can continue to levitate as far above the presidential ticket as polls now show. “A Democratic Senate majority coalition relies on having both Senators from a state such as Michigan,” said Daniel Hopkins, a University of Pennsylvania political scientist. As recently as the 1980s, it was common for voters to split their tickets in Senate races. Still, even that alignment left room for some Senate candidates to swim against this general tide. This history, by itself, doesn’t answer whether Democratic Senate candidates would have better prospects with or without Biden as their presidential nominee.

Persons: Joe Biden, Biden, Donald Trump, Republican Sen, Susan Collins of, Trump, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, Sonia Sotomayor, ”, Democratic Sen, Evan Bayh, Bayh, “, —, Sen, Joe Manchin, who’s, Democratic Sens, Sherrod Brown of, Jon Tester, Montana, Bob Casey, Tammy Baldwin, Jacky Rosen, Elissa Slotkin, Ruben Gallego, Kyrsten, Martin Heinrich, Nella Domenici, Pete Domenici, Curtis Bashaw, Andy Kim, Bob Menendez, Rick Scott, Ted Cruz, Collins, Ron Johnson, Daniel Hopkins, — hasn’t, David Bergstein, ” Bergstein, ” Mike Berg, ” Lee Drutman, Drutman, Biden’s, ” Drutman, Democratic pollster, ” Jason Kander, Kander, Hillary Clinton, Clinton, Roy Blunt, doesn’t, ” Kander, ” Bayh, Republican Todd Young, it’s, Ronald Reagan’s, Barack Obama, Obama, Republican Dean Heller, Heller —, Steve Bullock, Jesse Hunt, Hunt, Hopkins Organizations: CNN, Senate, Democratic, Republican, White, GOP, West, Republicans, Biden, Democratic Sens, Democrats, Trump, University of Pennsylvania, don’t, Democratic Senatorial, “ Republicans, National Republican Senatorial, Democratic Senate, ”, White House, Indiana Senate, Democratic Gov Locations: Susan Collins of Maine, Indiana, West Virginia, Sherrod Brown of Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Nevada, Michigan, Arizona, New Mexico, New Jersey, Florida, Texas, North Carolina, — Maine, Florida , Iowa, Ohio, New America, Missouri, Southern, Maine, Iowa , Kansas , Kentucky, Montana , South Carolina

☆ When the Supreme Court Gets Mixed Up With Trump Derangement Syndrome - The New York Times
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-05 | by ( William Baude | ) www.nytimes.com time to read: +1 min

At the end of another momentous term, the Supreme Court has issued major rulings that will reshape the law. For the most part, this criticism does not give the Supreme Court enough credit. In case after case, it has rightly emphasized the importance of turning to historical understandings in deciding constitutional cases rather than imposing modern policy views. Most of the court’s decisions are principled and sound — most but unfortunately not all. Still, for most of the term, the court based its decisions on historical understandings.

Persons: Donald Trump, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Biden Organizations: Appeals, Ninth Circuit

☆ Biden digs his heels in while Trump secures another win
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-02 | by ( Dan Defrancesco | ) www.businessinsider.com time to read: +7 min

In today's big story, we're looking at President Joe Biden showing no signs of giving up his reelection campaign while former President Donald Trump secured a win from the Supreme Court . AdvertisementBiden's campaign has been in full-blown crisis mode after the president's disastrous debate against former President Donald Trump last week. AdvertisementMeanwhile, Trump secured a big win in his immunity case . The Supreme Court ruled that former presidents don't get absolute immunity from criminal charges related to actions under the scope of the presidency, but they do get some. 3 things in techStefani Reynolds/BloombergBig Tech gets a big win from the Supreme Court.

Persons: —, Joe Biden, Donald Trump, he's, Biden, Allison Joyce, Getty, Tyler Le, he'd, it'd, John L, Dorman, Biden's, Manuel Balce Ceneta, Jacquelyn Martin, Kamala Harris, Gavin Newsom, Gretchen Whitmer, Harris, isn't, Trump, don't, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Alyssa Powell, David Kelly, Jonathan Xiong, Blackstone, Keith Lerner, Truist, Stefani Reynolds, OpenAI, It's, Gen Zers, Kevin Costner's, Kevin Costner, Dan DeFrancesco, Jordan Parker Erb, Hallam Bullock, Annie Smith, Amanda Yen Organizations: Service, Michelin, Business, The New York Times, Biden, Democrats, Trump, Justice, Getty, Citadel, Bloomberg Big Tech, ChatGPT, Atlantic Locations: Manhattan, Asia, Millennium, New York, London

☆ Biden solemnly warns that the Supreme Court has fundamentally changed the country with its immunity ruling: 'May God help preserve our democracy'
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-02 | by ( Katherine Tangalakis-Lippert | ) www.businessinsider.com time to read: +1 min

President Joe Biden on Monday evening weighed in on the SCOTUS ruling on presidential immunity. With its decision, Biden said SCOTUS "fundamentally changed" the country. AdvertisementPresident Joe Biden on Monday warned that the Supreme Court's decision to grant presidents immunity from criminal prosecution for "official acts" will fundamentally change the country. "Today's Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity — that fundamentally changed for all practical purposes. Today's decision almost certainly means that there are virtually no limits on what the president can do."

Persons: Joe Biden, SCOTUS, Biden, Sonia Sotomayor's, — Organizations: Service, Cross, White, Business Locations: America, United States

☆ Biden seizes on Trump’s Supreme Court triumph to seek redemption after debate debacle
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-02 | by ( Stephen Collinson | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +9 min

“Now the American people will have to do what the court should have been willing to do and would not: Americans will have to render a judgment about Donald Trump’s behavior,” Biden said. In four minutes, Biden, 81, encapsulated the two increasingly grave and urgent choices facing voters in November. “The American people must decide (whether) Trump’s embrace of violence to preserve his power is acceptable. “THE SUPREME COURT DECISION IS A MUCH MORE POWERFUL ONE THAN SOME HAD EXPECTED IT TO BE. Here’s what she said … ‘In every use of official power, the president is now a king above the law.

Persons: CNN — “, Joe Biden, Donald Trump, Biden, —, Donald Trump’s, ” Biden, time’s, Biden’s, Camp David, he’d, Trump, George Washington, “, …, … Donald Trump, he’ll, ” Trump, ’, he’s, it’s, ”, Andrew McCabe, CNN’s Kaitlan Collins, Sonia Sotomayor, Sotomayor’s, ” “ Organizations: CNN, White, Justice Department, SOME, BIDEN, FBI, Trump Locations: Camp, Atlanta, Gettysburg, United States

CNN —The Supreme Court handed down a landmark decision Monday granting Donald Trump partial immunity from special counsel Jack Smith’s election subversion case, handing the former president a significant win during his reelection bid. For starters, the Supreme Court ruled that for “core” presidential activity, Trump has the absolute immunity he had sought. The analysis about what’s immune and what isn’t “ultimately is best left to the lower courts to perform,” Roberts wrote. Immune, immune, immune,” she wrote. In a significant break from the court’s other conservatives, Barrett seemed to suggest Trump should go to trial quickly.

Persons: Donald Trump, Jack Smith’s, Smith, John Roberts, “, ” Roberts, ”, Trump, Justice Department –, isn’t “, Roberts, What’s, Tanya Chutkan, Sonia Sotomayor, Sotomayor, ” Sotomayor, Honig, Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, ” Trump’s, Barrett, Amy Coney Barrett, Trump’s, ” Barrett, David Cole, Thomas, Clarence Thomas, Merrick Garland, Garland, hasn’t, ” Thomas, CNN’s Katelyn Polantz Organizations: CNN, Supreme Court, Justice Department, Trump, American Civil Liberties Union, Senate Locations: Washington , DC, Florida

But the court’s opinion also makes clear that this ruling is not a death knell for Smith’s case. Smith charged Trump with engaging in a “criminal scheme” to subvert the 2020 election; Trump has pleaded not guilty to four counts. In Nixon v. Fitzgerald, the Supreme Court held that a president enjoyed civil immunity for all “official acts.” Now, in Trump v. United States, the court grappled with which “official” acts should also receive criminal immunity. In order to settle the extent of Trump’s immunity, Chutkan should expeditiously schedule the mini-trial to hear witness testimony and receive other relevant evidence from both parties. In response to Trump’s assertion of civil immunity there, the DC Circuit put in place a lengthy discovery schedule for the lower court to determine the extent of Trump’s civil immunity.

Persons: Norman Eisen, “, Donald Trump, Danya Perry, Joshua Kolb, Neil Gorsuch, Jack Smith’s, Donald Trump’s, Norm Eisen, Tanya Chutkan, Smith, Trump, Nixon, Fitzgerald, —, Joshua Kolb CJ, John Roberts, Justice Department —, Mike Pence, Mark Meadows, Jeffrey Clark —, Clark, Steve Jones, Meadows, Brad Raffensperger, Jones, Meadows’s, Sotomayor, Chutkan, Pence, Bill Barr —, Trump’s, slimming, ”, Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson Organizations: CNN, Perry Law, Division, Southern, of, State, Moreland Commission, Nixon, Trump v ., Justice Department, Trump, White, Trump administration, Georgia, Meadows, Circuit, Congress, Capitol Police, Capitol, DC Circuit, Twitter Locations: of New York, New York, Moreland, Trump v, Trump v . United States, Georgia, Fulton, Meadows

☆ Sotomayor says the president can now 'assassinate a political rival' without facing prosecution
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-01 | by ( Bryan Metzger | Natalie Musumeci | ) www.businessinsider.com time to read: +3 min

Read previewIn her dissenting opinion to the Supreme Court's ruling on presidential immunity, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said that the conservative majority had enabled presidents to assassinate political rivals without fear of criminal prosecution. Related stories"When he uses his official powers in any way, under the majority's reasoning, he now will be insulated from criminal prosecution," Sotomayor wrote. Immune, immune, immune." Trump's lawyers had argued that he was immune from criminal prosecution over those efforts because they fell within the scope of his official duties. AdvertisementFormer federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani disagreed with Sotomayer, saying that there would be no presidential immunity for extreme circumstances like ordering the assassination of a political rival.

Persons: —, Sonia Sotomayor, Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Donald Trump, Neama Rahmani, Sotomayer Organizations: Service, Business, Trump, Justice Department, Trump electors

☆ Live Updates: Supreme Court Says Trump Is Partly Shielded From Prosecution
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-01 | by ( Adam Liptak | ) www.nytimes.com time to read: +5 min

The Supreme Court heard two other cases this term concerning the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., writing for the majority, said Mr. Trump had immunity for his official acts. Two of the four charges against Mr. Trump are based on that law. After the appeals court ruled against Mr. Trump, he asked the Supreme Court to intervene. At the argument, several of the conservative justices did not seem inclined to examine the details of the charges against Mr. Trump.

Persons: Donald J, Trump, John G, Roberts, ”, Sonia Sotomayor, Tom Brenner, Tanya S, Jack Smith, Smith’s, Neil M, Gorsuch Organizations: Capitol, “, The New York Times, Justice Department, Federal, Court, U.S ., Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, Trump, Mr Locations: Washington, United States

☆ Immunity Ruling Escalates Long Rise of Presidential Power
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-01 | by ( Charlie Savage | ) www.nytimes.com time to read: +1 min

The Supreme Court’s decision to bestow presidents with immunity from prosecution over official actions is an extraordinary expansion of executive power that will reverberate long after Donald J. Trump is gone. Beyond its immediate implications for the election subversion case against Mr. Trump and the prospect that he may feel less constrained by law if he returns to power, the ruling also adds to the nearly relentless rise of presidential power since the mid-20th century. It had seemed like a constitutional truism in recent years when more than one lower-court opinion addressing novel legal issues raised by Mr. Trump’s norm-breaking behavior observed that presidents are not kings. “The relationship between the president and the people he serves has shifted irrevocably,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in an outraged dissent joined by the court’s other two liberals. “In every use of official power, the president is now a king above the law.”

Persons: Donald J, Trump, Sonia Sotomayor, ” Organizations: “

☆ Analysis: The Supreme Court just gave presidents a superpower. Here’s its explanation
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-01 | by ( Zachary B. Wolf | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +14 min

But Congress may not criminalize the President’s conduct in carrying out the responsibilities of the Executive Branch under the Constitution. Juries can’t even consider official acts in terms of a prosecution, according to the Supreme Court. This case poses a question of lasting significance: When may a former President be prosecuted for official acts taken during his Presidency? She said they could easily have expressed that some of Trump’s conduct was unofficial. Sorting private from official conduct sometimes will be difficult—but not always.

Persons: Donald Trump’s, Trump, John Roberts, Here’s Roberts, ”, Roberts, ’, –, Jack Smith’s, John Sauer, Amy Coney Barrett, Barrett, Mike Pence, Pence, they’re, George Washington’s, Smith, Clarence Thomas, “, …, Sonia Sotomayor, Trump’s, Sotomayor Organizations: CNN, Trump, Branch, Capitol, Supreme, Government, Founders Locations: Washington ,, Washington, United States

☆ Supreme Court dissents take a 'darker tone' on Trump immunity ruling
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-01 | by ( Rebecca Picciotto | ) www.cnbc.com time to read: +2 min

Supreme Court Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Ketanji Brown Jackson and Elena Kagan laid out grim visions of U.S. democracy in their joint written dissents to the court's Monday decision on former President Donald Trump's claim of presidential immunity from criminal prosecution. "In every use of official power, the President is now a king above the law," Sotomayor wrote. It's more of a warning," LaCroix told CNBC in an interview about the three dissents, written by the only three justices nominated to the court by Democratic presidents. The immediate effect was to send special counsel Jack Smith's criminal election fraud case against Trump back to U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan. She will have to rule on whether the criminal charges pertain to official acts Trump carried out as president, granting him immunity, or his private conduct.

Persons: Sonia Sotomayor, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Elena Kagan, Donald Trump's, Sotomayor, Jackson, Alison LaCroix, LaCroix, Jack, Tanya Chutkan, Trump Organizations: University of Chicago, CNBC, Democratic, Trump, Republicans Locations: U.S

☆ Vehement Dissent From Supreme Court’s Liberal Wing Laments Vast Expansion of Presidential Power
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-01 | by ( Charlie Savage | More About Charlie Savage | ) www.nytimes.com time to read: +1 min

The Supreme Court’s three Democratic appointees railed in dissent against the conservative majority’s ruling that former President Donald J. Trump has some immunity for his official actions, declaring that their colleagues had made the president into “a king above the law.”Writing that the majority was “deeply wrong,” Justice Sonia Sotomayor added that beyond its consequences for the bid to prosecute Mr. Trump for his attempt to subvert the outcome of the 2020 election, it would have “stark” long-term consequences for the future of American democracy. “The court effectively creates a law-free zone around the president, upsetting the status quo that has existed since the founding,” she wrote, in an opinion joined by the other two Democratic appointees, Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. Insulating the president of the United States — the most powerful person in the country and possibly the world, she noted — from criminal prosecution when he uses his official powers will allow him to freely use his official power to violate the law, exploit the trappings of his office for personal gain, or other “evil ends.”

Persons: Donald J, Trump, Sonia Sotomayor, Mr, ”, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson Organizations: Democratic, United Locations: “, United States

☆ Live Updates: Supreme Court Gives Trump Substantial Immunity From Prosecution
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-01 | by ( Adam Liptak | Simon Levien | ) www.nytimes.com time to read: +8 min

The Supreme Court heard two other cases this term concerning the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol. Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., writing for the majority, said Mr. Trump had at least presumptive immunity for his official acts. If Mr. Trump prevails at the polls, he could order the Justice Department to drop the charges. After the appeals court ruled against Mr. Trump, he asked the Supreme Court to intervene. At the argument, several of the conservative justices did not seem inclined to examine the details of the charges against Mr. Trump.

Persons: Donald J, Trump, John G, Roberts, Broad, ” “, Justice Roberts, ”, Sonia Sotomayor, “, Trump’s, Mike Pence, Justice Sotomayor, Tom Brenner, Tanya S, Jack Smith, Smith’s, Neil M, Gorsuch Organizations: Capitol, Justice Department, Department, Mr, The New York Times, Federal, Court, U.S ., Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, Trump Locations: United States, Washington

☆ Supreme Court rules Trump has limited immunity in January 6 case, jeopardizing trial before election
▼ + stars: | 2024-07-01 | by ( John Fritze | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +7 min

Justice Sonia Sotomayor issued a lengthy and strongly worded dissent in which she excoriated the court for its decision. The chief justice said the trial court will have to assess what of Trump’s alleged conduct is immunized under the new test handed down by the high court, and the opinion said that additional briefing will be needed for the trial court to do so. Justice Amy Coney Barrett expressed frustration with how the court was sending the case back down for more proceedings. She suggested that because Trump’s wholesale challenge to the indictment had failed, at least some of the case could go forward. In that sense, if Smith narrowed his indictment, lower courts could hear the Trump trial this year.

Persons: Donald Trump, Trump, Sonia Sotomayor, John Roberts, “, ” Roberts, Trump’s, ”, Roberts, Amy Coney Barrett, ” Barrett, Jack Smith’s, Mike Pence, Biden, Smith, –, ‘, ’ Sotomayor, ” Sotomayor, CNN’s Paula Reid, Nikki Carvajal, Priscilla Alvarez Organizations: CNN, of Justice, Trump, Government

CNN —A major Supreme Court ruling Friday that shifted power from the executive branch to the judiciary stands to transform how the federal government works. By overturning a 1984 precedent, the court’s conservative majority has made countless regulations vulnerable to legal challenge. The Supreme Court ruling could boost efforts by conservatives who have taken aim at the Biden Environmental Protection Agency’s rules limiting planet-warming pollution from vehicles, oil and gas wells and pipelines, and power plants. The ruling has injected legal uncertainty into regulations of all types, including those on technology, labor, the environment and health care. But the Supreme Court has yet to decide a case heard this term that might gut that limitation.

Persons: ”, Kent Barnett, —, Thomas Berry, John Roberts, Roberts, Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, Joe Biden, Shawn ThewPool, Adam Rust, ” Rust, Andrew Schwartzman, Alexander MacDonald, ” MacDonald, Sharon Block, ” Block, Biden, Andrew Twinamatsiko, ” Twinamatsiko, “, Paul Gallant, TD Cowen, David Vladeck, Chevron —, Ann Carlson, Carlson, David Doniger Organizations: CNN, Biden, University of Georgia School of Law, Chevron, Natural Resources Defense, Republican, Democratic, Cato Institute . Chief, State of, Consumer, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, Federal Trade Commission, Consumer Federation of America, “, Supreme, Securities, Exchange Commission, Benton Institute for Broadband & Society, Department of Labor, National Labor Relations Board, Opportunity Commission, Harvard Law School, Center, Labor, American Cancer Society, US Food and Drug Administration, US Department of Health, Human Services, Medicare, Services, Medicaid, Human Services Department, HHS, O’Neill Institute for National, Global Health Law, Georgetown University, FDA, Federal Communications Commission, EPA, National, Traffic Safety Administration, University of California, Natural Resources Defense Council Locations: Obamacare, Chevron, State, Washington , DC, Texas, Littler, Los Angeles

☆ Oral dissents are back in vogue at the Supreme Court as liberals lament latest rulings
▼ + stars: | 2024-06-29 | by ( Joan Biskupic | ) edition.cnn.com time to read: +9 min

CNN —As the conservative Supreme Court majority has won case after case in recent days, liberal dissenters are having their moment in the courtroom. Other justices stared out at spectators or down at notes, perhaps anticipating the next opinions, and dissents, to be revealed. The court majority reversed a 1984 milestone that required judges to defer to reasonable agency interpretations of their congressional mandates. Her oral dissent lasted nearly 15 minutes, about five minutes longer than Roberts’ rendition of the majority opinion. They begin with the author of the majority opinion delivering the facts of the case, law involved, and the resolution.

Persons: Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, Ketanji Brown Jackson, Neil Gorsuch, Sotomayor, ”, “, ” Gorsuch, John Roberts, Kagan, Roberts, They’ve, Kagan’s, ” Kagan, Roe, Wade, Gorsuch, Sotomayor’s, Antonin Scalia, Jackson, Amy Coney Barrett, Barrett, improvidently, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas, ” Alito, Biden, chiding Organizations: CNN, Friday, Natural Resources Defense, “, Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, US Justice Department, Labor, Conservative Locations: Oregon, Grants, American, Idaho

Search resuls for: "Sonia Soto"

25 mentions found