Angela Cornell, a Cornell Law School labor law professor, called it "another decision that undermines the capacity of unions to function."
MORE STRIKESThe ruling comes at a time of increasing strikes called by U.S. labor unions.
Some experts pointed out that the ruling largely preserved the existing legal scaffolding for deciding labor law preemption cases of this kind.
The Supreme Court, with its 6-3 conservative majority, has dealt setbacks to organized labor in key cases in recent years.
Brudney said Thursday's ruling "was not comparable to that broader trendline" of decisions weakening labor unions.
Persons:
Amy Coney Barrett, Angela Cornell, Cornell, Kenneth Dau, Schmidt, Benjamin Sachs, Sachs, Dan Altchek, Saul Ewing, Altchek, James Brudney, Brudney, Anne Marie Lofaso, Lofaso, John Kruzel, Will Dunham
Organizations:
U.S, Supreme, Taiheiyo Cement Corp, Cornell Law School, Indiana University Maurer School of Law, Harvard Law, Glacier, Inc, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, National Labor Relations, U.S . Bureau of Labor Statistics, Fordham University Law, West Virginia University College of Law, Thomson
Locations:
Japan, Washington, Philadelphia, California